题目内容

Introduction and Interview
Introduction (compulsory)
Good morning/afternoon. My name is
Can you tell me your full name, please？
What should I call you？
Could you tell me where you're from？
Can I see your identification, please？
Thank you. Now in this first part I'd like to ask you some questions about yourself.
Interview (choose 1 )
Let's talk about where you live.
Tell me about the area where you live.
What do you find most enjoyable about living there？ Why？
What is the area where you live famous or well known for？
Let's talk about your studies.
How long have you been studying English？
What do you like most about studying English？
Why are you sitting the IELTS test？
Interview (choose 2)
Now let's talk about transport.
What is your preferred mode of transport？ Why？
Do most of your friends use this method of transport to get around？
Are there any problems traveling around your city？ Why？
In what way do these problems affect you？
Now let's talk about a regular day for you.
Tell me about a typical day for you.
Which time of day do you prefer？ Why？
Do you think you will always prefer this time of day？ Why/Why not？
Are there any times of day that you don't like？ Why？
Now let's talk about collecting things.
Do you or anyone you know collect things？ Why/Why not？
How does she go about collecting these items？
How long has she been collecting these items？
What is the value in collecting things do you think？

查看答案

搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈

更多问题

结合材料回答问题：
材料1
今天的中心问题是一切为了抗日，一切经过抗日民族统一战线，一切服从抗日。现在我们要用这样的原则去组织群众。……我们要拥护统一指挥。八路军也要统一受蒋指挥。我们不怕统一纪律、统一作战计划、统一经济，不过注意不要受到无谓的牺牲。红军的改编不仅名义改变，而且内容也改变了。……要使人家一到特区，便感觉特区是中华民国的组成部分。
摘自：王明《如何继续全国抗战与争取抗战胜利呢？》
材料2
我们党的历史，从一九二一年第一次全国代表大会那个时候起，到现在，已经整整十八年了。十八年中，党经历了许多伟大的斗争。党员、党的干部、党的组织，在这些伟大斗争中，锻炼了自己。他们经历过伟大的革命胜利，也经历过严重的革命失败。同资产阶级建立过民族统一战线，又由于这种统一战线的破裂，同大资产阶级及其同盟者进行过严重的武装斗争。最近三年，则又处于同资产阶级建立民族统一战线的时期中。中国革命和中国共产党的发展道路，是在这样同中国资产阶级的复杂关联中走过的。这是一个历史的特点，殖民地半殖民地革命过程中的特点，而为任何资本主义国家的革命史中所没有的。
摘自：毛泽东《(共产党人)发刊词》
材料3
我党要在民族统一战线的原则下，更加独立自主地去发动民众运动。除开深入与扩大我党的政治宣传外，必须坚决广泛地发动群众的经济斗争，使群众的经济斗争与抗日武装斗争联系起来。要加强反对右的危险倾向，这种倾向表现在因为惧怕同盟者不高兴，惧怕吓退同盟者，而停止与减弱领导群众的斗争，放弃领导群众改善经济生活的斗争，惧怕用八路军与党的名义公开去动员群众，模糊我党独立的政治面目。同时，必须反对左倾错误，这种错误表现在不顾统一战线的原则，提出过高的口号，在工作方式与斗争方式上不必要地去刺激同盟者等。目前，我们不要去依赖同盟者的帮助，而应独立自主地去领导群众与游击战争，但我们应尽可能取得同盟者更多的帮助。我们不要惧怕吓退同盟者而停止领导群众的斗争，但我们在工作方式与斗争方式上要尽可能不故意刺激与吓退同盟者。目前是要在统一战线的原则下更进一步地发展我党的独立自主，而不是绝对的独立自主。
摘自：毛泽东《独立自主地领导华北抗日游击战争》
请回答：
(1)材料1说明了什么？对此中国共产党采取了什么方针？
(2)材料2中的“复杂关联”指的是什么？
(3)结合新民主主义革命的历史实际，阐述中国共产党领导和建立统一战线的基本经验。
(39)

工程预付款是多少？预付款从何时开始扣回？开工3个月后，总监理工程师每个月签认的工程款是多少？

We now find that a great many things we thought were Natural Laws are really human conventions. You know that even in the remotest depth of stellar space there are still three feet to a yard. That is.no doubt, a very remarkable fact, but you would hardly call it a law of nature. And a great many things that have been regarded as laws of nature are of that kind. (1)On the other hand, where you can get down to any knowledge of what atoms actually do, you will find that they are much less subject to law than people thought, and that the laws at which you arrive are sta tistical averages of just the sort that would emerge from chance. There is, as we all know, a law that if you throw dice you will get double sixes only about once in thirty-six times, and we do not regard that as evidence that the fall of the dice is regulated by design;on the contrary, if the double sixes came every time we should think that there was design.
The laws of nature are of that sort a s regards to a great many of them. They are statistical averages such as would emerge from the laws of chance;and that makes the whole business of natural law much less impressive than it formerly was. (2) Quite apart from that, which represents the momentary state of science that may change tomorrow, the whole idea that natural laws imply a law-giver is due to a confusion between natural and human laws.
Human laws are behests commanding you to behave a certain way, in which way you may choose to behave, or you may choose not to behave; (3) but natural laws are a description of how things do in fact behave, and, being a mere description of what they in fact do, you cannot argue that there must be somebody who told them to do that, because even supposing that there were you are then faced with the question, Why did God issue just those natural laws and not others？
If you say that he did it simply from his own good pleasure, and without any reason, you then find that there is something which is not subject to law, and so your train of natural law is interrupted. If you say, as more orthodox theologians do, that in all the laws which God issues he had a reason for giving those laws rather than others—the reason, of course, being to create the best universe, although you would never think to look at it—if there was a reason for the laws which God gave, then God himself was subject to law and therefore you do not get any advantage by introducing God as an intermediary.
(4) You really have a law outside and anterior to the divine edicts, and God does not serve your purpose, because he is not the ultimate law-giver. In short, this whole argument from natural law no longer has anything like the strength that it used to have. I am traveling on in time in my review of these arguments. The arguments that are used for the existence of God change their character as time goes on. (5) They were at first hard intellectual arguments embodying certain quite definite fallacies. As we come to modem times they become less respectable intellectually and more affected by a kind of moralizing vagueness.
(61)

Dr. ElBaradei said his hope is that the Nobel Peace Prize will A(serve to help) the internationalcommnunity and to achieve the goal of developing a functional system of global security that does not B(derive from) C(a nuclear weap ons deterrent), D(would rather) based on addressing the security concerns of all people.