题目内容

国际社会为协调相互间的货币政策和加强合作所建立的政府问金融机构是()。

A. 世界银行
B. 国际货币基金组织
C. 国际金融公司
D. 国际清算组织

查看答案
更多问题

房地产开发企业在领取营业执照后的()内,应当到登记机关所在地的县级以上地方人民政府规定的部门备案。

A. 十天
B. 十五天
C. 一个月
D. 两个月

听力原文:Which of the following is the position of Bill in Guangzhou Office?
(22)

A. Production manager.
B. Lab manager.
C. Sales manager.
D. Quality control manager.

听力原文:Which of the following is NOT correct?
(32)

A. There is no greenhouse gas now, since it has been well under control.
B. Now the production of CFCs used in refrigerators is only one third of that in the mid- 1980s.
C. Oxides of sulfur can lead to acid rain and smog.
D. The amount of lead, soot and carbon monoxide that are sent out has been reduced sharply.

听力原文:Environmentalists say pollution is terrible and becoming worse. Businessmen retort that a real cleanup would cost too much. The ordinary citizen believes both: the environment is indeed going down the drain, but so might his job if anyone tries to stop that. All of them, it turns out, are wrong.
Recent statistics show that, in rich countries at least, many of the worst pollution problems are far smaller than they used to be — and that the costs of this success have so far been small.
Start with air pollution. The dreaded greenhouse gases are still flowing into the atmosphere. But output of gases that attack the ozone layer is well under control. Production of CFCs used in refrigerators has fallen by two-thirds since the mid- 1980s. Many pollutants have been beaten back. The flow of oxides of sulfur, which contribute to evils such as acid rain and smog, has fallen by around a third in rich countries since 1980. Emissions of lead, soot and carbon monoxide—each hazardous to human health—have also fallen sharply.
Water quality has improved in many ways. There is still worry about chemicals, such as fertilizers and heavy metals, draining off the land. But many of the organisms that once infested rich-world waterways — and which still kill millions in poor countries — are retreating steadily. Progress is due largely to the spread of waste water treatment.
Has this cost jobs? There is no evidence for that. Spending on pollution control amounts to 1% — 2% of GDP in most rich countries, but that has not cut jobs overall.
Question :What is this passage mainly about?
(30)

An arguement for environmental protection.
B. An arguement against environmental protection.
C. An arguement for common citizens.
D. A clarification of a misconception about environment pollution and its cost.

答案查题题库