题目内容

张某2008年12月18日向某保险公司投保了保险期为1年的家庭财产保险，其保险金额为万元，2009年2月28日张某家因意外发生火灾，火灾发生时，张某的家庭财产实际价值为50万若按第一危险赔偿方式，
则：(1)家庭财产损失10万元时，保险公司应赔偿多少？为什么？
(2)家庭财产损失45万元时，保险公司又应赔偿多少？为什么？

查看答案

搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈

更多问题

企业报废一台设备，原值8万元，已提折旧7万元。清理结束产生净收益5000元。(作设备转入清理及结转清理净损益的会计分录。)

听力原文： Man: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Factories of the Year award. My name is Jonathan Hargreaves, and I'm Chief Executive of the Institute of Production Research, which organised these awards, in association with Barrington Business School. I'm delighted to introduce to you the school's professor of manufacturing science, Jacqueline Allen, who again chaired the panel of judges. Jacqueline.
Woman: Thank you, Jonathan, and good morning, everyone. This year's search for the Factories of the Year has produced a bumper crop of outstanding winners, which is very welcome proof that the old economy isn't dead, but is emerging revitalised from its recent problems.
As ever, we initiated our search for the best by sending each participating factory a questionnaire. This consisted of fourteen pages and probably more questions than the recipients would have liked. From their answers, each factory was assessed on a basket of performance criteria. Some of these were immediately measurable, like handover times, which of course can have a big impact on productivity and which are showing a healthy tendency towards being shortened. Another was delivery reliability, a high score in which is essential for any customer-led organisation.
Other criteria which we considered were less tangible, but no less important for that. We took staff morale very seriously, because if it's poor it can have measurable results such as high staff turnover and a high accident rate. And if a business can't easily handle change, it may well create more problems than it solves, and its future is unlikely to be secure.
The next step was for the panel of judges to assess the results and devise a shortlist. We then visited these factories. I must say, I found it fascinating to see so many factories in action. As a result of these visits, we came up with the three winners in each category.
The factories that emerged from this process shared some familiar characteristics. Impressive people-management practices, for a start. A determination among the factory's management team not to be second best, for another. And acting on the realisation that clever initiatives don't count if they don't further a factory's mission. No successful factory can, for a moment, forget its customers, whether they're internal to the company or external.
As ever, new trends emerged: an outstanding level of competence in supply-chain management, as well as in manufacturing, is increasingly important. The links between a factory, its suppliers and its customers can make or break an operation.
This year's winners also demonstrate the importance of optimising the movement of goods and people around the factory. Confused, muddled-looking factories underperform, while successful ones use signs to help staff and visitors find the best route to their destination. And allowing goods or materials to get lost in some dusty corner of the warehouse is unacceptable: the problem of tracking components as they move through production has led to a number of developments, of which electronic tagging is one of the most exciting.
Now I'd like to turn to the individual categories...
&8226;You will hear the opening of the Factories of the Year awards ceremony.
&8226;As you listen, for questions 1-12, complete the notes, using up to three words or a number.
&8226;After you have listened once, replay the recording.
Notes on selection procedure
Panel of judges:
&8226;Head of panel, Jacqueline Allen, teaches (1)__ at Barrington Business School
Selection process: first stage
&8226;a questionnaire that was (2) long
Measurable performance criteria included:
&8226;length of (3) which affect productivity
&8226;success in achieving reliable (4)

What changes have taken place in Russian stores？

该道路工程有哪些违反了操作规程？为什么？