题目内容

A federal judge on Monday certified a $ 200 billion class action lawsuit against the tobacco industry for its marketing of light cigarettes.
Eastern District of New York Judge Jack B. Weinstein's 540-page opinion in Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. , 04-CIV-1945—which included an additional 965 pages of appendices for a total of 1,505 pages-gave tens of millions of smokers an avenue to recover damages from the nation's largest tobacco companies, including Philip Morris USA Inc. , R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , Lorillard Tobacco Co. , and Liggett Group, Inc.
The class will include anyone who purchased light cigarettes from the time tobacco companies began selling them in the 1970s. The judge said he even would consider broadening the class, to encompass smokers of all "low tar" brands, not just light cigarettes. The judge suggested that an expansion of the class could assist the parties in negotiating a global settlement. He set a trial date for January 22, 2007. The plaintiffs intend to seek treble damages.
Weinstein has expressed skepticism about the plaintiffs' theory of damages, which alleges that light smokers were defrauded of billions because they believed they were buying a product of greater value because of its health advantages. The judge also questioned the size of the class, as well as the claim that as many as 90 percent of light cigarette smokers chose the cigarettes because they were less harmful.
In his ruling Monday, the judge stressed that while the suit was far from perfect, the evidence was sufficient. He said the jury system—which he described as the "ultimate focus group of the law"—was well equipped to sort out the particulars in accordance with Amendment VII of the U. S. Constitution.
Weinstein declined to grant an interlocutory appeal to the 2nd U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Theodore M. Grossman of Jones Day in Cleveland, which represents R J. Reynolds, said the defendants would seek a stay and appeal the class certification under Rule 23 (f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
From the passage it can be inferred that "a $ 200 billion class action lawsuit" is one that ______.

A. requires a public fund of $ 200 billion
B. may lead to US $ 200 billion in payment
C. involves an investment of US $ 200 billion
D. is about what the tobacco industry is worth

查看答案
更多问题

讯问不满18周岁的证人,应通知其法定代理人或者教师在场。()

A. 正确
B. 错误

下列程序段的输出结果是 CLEAR STORE 10 TO A STORE 20 TO B SET UDFPARMS TO REFERENCE DO SWAP WITH A,(

A. 10 20
B. 20 20
C. 20 10
D. 10 10

假设用户名和口令存储在自由表“口令表”中,当用户输入用户名和口令并单击录”按钮时,若用户名输入错误,则提示“用户名错误”;若用户名输入正确,而口令输入错误,则提示“口令错误”。若命令按钮“登录”的click事件中的代码如 USE 口令表 GO TOP flag=0 DO WHILE.not.EOF0 IF Ailtrim(用户名)=Alltrim(This form.Text1.Value) IF Alltrim(口令)=Alltrim(Thisform.Text2.Value) WA1T"欢迎使用"WIN DOW TIMEOUT2 ELSE WAIT"口令错误" WINDOW TIMEOUT2 ENDIF flag=1 EXIT ENDIF SKIP ENDDO IF______ WAIT"用户名错误"WINDOW TIMEOUT2 ENDIF 则在横线处应填写的代码是

A. flag=-1
B. flag=0
C. flag=1
D. flag=2

What can we infer from the last paragraph?

A. Teachers welcome the imposition of technology uses.
B. Higher administration's support is the most critical to the use of instrumental technologies.
C. The teacher using instrumental technologies may have longer tenure.
D. The instrumental technologies are easy to use.

答案查题题库