题目内容

A.Monday and Tuesday.B.Tuesday and Wednesday.C.Wednesday and Thursday.D.Thursday and F

A. Monday and Tuesday.
B. Tuesday and Wednesday.
C. Wednesday and Thursday.
D. Thursday and Friday.

查看答案
更多问题

THE BLENDING OF THE UNITED STATES
For years, Jorge Del Pinal's job as assistant chief of the Census Bureau's Population Division was to fit people into neat, distinct racial and ethnic boxes: white, black, Hispanic, Asian or Native American. As the son of an Anglo mother and a Hispanic father, however, he knew all along that the task was not always possible.
For the 2000 decennial census, that will no longer be the case. For the flint time, the census forms will allow people to check off as many races as apply. As a result, the Census Bureau should obtain a better picture of the extent of intermarriage in the United States.
In the absence of such a direct method, a few years ago veteran demographer Barry Edmonston used sophisticated mathematical modeling techniques to calculate how intermarriage is changing the face of the United States as part of an immigration study he directed for the National Research Council of the American Academy of Sciences. His research was summarized in a report entitled The New Americans: Economic, Demographic and Fiscal Effects of Immigration. But as the Canadian-born, white husband of sociologist Sharon Lee, a Chinese-American, Edmonston really needed no computer to understand the transformation under way in this society. He and his family are living, breathing participants.
The face of America is changing-literally. As former President Clinton has said, within 30 or 40 years, when there will be no single race in the majority in the United States, "we had best be ready for it." For his part, Clinton is preparing for that, time by talking about racial tolerance and the virtues of multiculturalism. Others are debating immigration policy, almost all discussion focuses on the potential divisiveness inherent in a nation that is no longer a predominantly white country with a mostly European ancestry.
But afoot behind the scenes is another trend that, if handled carefully, could bring the country closer together rather than drive it apart. This quiet demographic counter-revolution is a dramatic upsurge in intermarriage.
Edmonston's study projected that by 2050, 21 percent of the U.S. population will be of mixed racial or ethnic ancestry, up from an estimate of seven percent today. Among third-generation Hispanic and Asian Americans, exogamy-marriage outside one's ethnic group or tribe-is at least 50 percent, he and others estimate. Exogamy remains much less prevalent among African Americans, but it has increased enormously, from about 1.5 percent in the 1960s to 8 to 10 percent today.
Such a profound demographic shift could take place while no one was watching because, officially, no one was watching. Federal agencies traditionally collected racial data using a formula-one person, one race-similar to the time-honored voting principle. Thus, the Census Bureau could estimate that on census forms no more than two percent of the population would claim to be multiracial. In the absence of a more straightforward count, no one could know for sure what the demographics are.
That's about to change. After the 2000 census, the U.S. Government should have a better idea. In 1997, the Office of Management and Budget, which oversees federal statistical practices, approved a directive allowing people to cheek as many racial boxes as they believe apply to them. The shift was a compromise between the demands of some interest groups that wanted the addition of a "multiracial" box, and those that objected to any change, fearing dilution of their numbers.
Meanwhile, in the absence of official numbers, with the heightened tension surrounding racial issues, and with the mutual suspicion that exists among competing racial and ethnic interest groups, there's little agreement on what intermarriage will mean for U.S. society in the future.
Melting Pot
To see the new face of the Un

A. Y
B. N
C. NG

听力原文:M: Hi! Jane, what have you been doing this summer holiday?
W: Working, mostly.
M: What kind of work have you been doing?
W: I've been working in a hotel.
M: What, as a waitress?
W: No, I've been helping in the kitchen most of the time—washing vegetables, preparing breakfast trays—that sort of thing.
M: Have you been enjoying it? Or has it been rather boring?
W: It hasn't been too bad. I've found it quite interesting, in fact.
M: And have you earned a lot of money?
W: Hardly, but I haven't done too badly. I've been getting $40 a week, plus my meals and my accommodation, so I've earned over $500 all together.
(17)

A. In a restaurant.
B. In a hotel.
C. In a supermarket.
D. In a library.

A.To present their results.B.To show off their results.C.To make themselves brave.D.To

A. To present their results.
B. To show off their results.
C. To make themselves brave.
D. To become active people.

听力原文:W: Did you get the job you applied for with that company?
M: It was offered to someone else, but I found a better one.
Q: How does the man probably feel?
(3)

A. Pleased.
B. Angry.
C. Nervous.
Disappointed.

答案查题题库