查题吧_考试题库_网课答案_大学生必备搜题网站

Questions 11 to 18 are based on the conversation you have just heard.

If you like mystery, chances are you’ve heard of Agatha Christie, possibly the world’s best-known mystery writer. Her books have sold over two billion copies worldwide. A. plague B. proceed C. pursue D. purchase

【背景资料】 2004年5月21日，某施工单位在某住宅小区10号楼工程施工中，使用一台FO/23B型自升式塔式起重机(行走时起升高度49.4m，最大幅度为45m)进行吊装作业时，由于违反起重吊装作业的安全规定，严重超载，造成变幅小车失控，塔身整体失控倾斜倒塌，将在该楼8层作业的2名工人砸死，起重机司机受重伤，直接经济损失40余万元。经事故调查，在吊装作业中，作业人员严重违反关于起重吊装“十不吊”的规定，超载运行。在施工中未认真贯彻执行安全生产法规，对施工现场监督检查不力，特别是对职工安全生产意识和遵纪守法的教育工作不落实，形成了事故隐患和违章行为长期得不到解决和制止的现状，最终导致事故发生。【问题】1. 1．简要分析造成这起事故的原因。 2．吊装作业时预防触电事故的安全技术措施有哪些 3．起重吊装作业专项施工方案编制的主要内容有哪些

Directions: Complete the sentences by translating into English the Chinese given in brackets. Please write your translation on Answer Sheet 2. The government announced safety equipment______ (不应该每年只检查一次).

买卖双方通过期货公司进行标准仓单与货款交换。买方通过其会员期货公司将货款交给卖方，而卖方则通过其会员期货公司将标准仓单交付给买方。( )

案例五背景：某单位为解决职工住房，新建一座住宅楼，地上20层地下2层，钢筋混凝土剪力墙结构，业主与施工单位、监理单位分别签订了施工合同、监理合同。施工单位(总包单位)将土方开挖、外墙涂料与防水工程分别分包给专业性公司，并签订了分包合同。施工合同中说明：建筑面积25586m2，建设工期450天，2000年9月1日开工，2001年12月26日竣工，工程造价3165万元。专用条款约定结算方法：合同价款调整范围为业主认定的工程量增减、设计变更和洽商；外墙涂料、防水工程的材料费。调整依据为本地区工程造价管理部门公布的价格调整文件。问题：监理工程师检查厕浴间防水工程，发现有漏水房间，逐一记录并要求防水公司整改。防水公司整改后向监理工程师进行了口头汇报，监理工程师即签证认可。事后发现仍有部分房间漏水，须进行返工。问返修的经济损失由谁承担，监理工程师有什么错误？

If you like mystery, chances are you’ve heard of Agatha Christie, possibly the world’s best-known mystery writer. Her books have sold over two billion copies worldwide. A. interacted B. intended C. attempted D. reversed

The image of people jumping from windows after the stock market crash of 1929 graphically illustrates the pattern detected by researchers from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "The overall suicide rate rises and falls in connection with the economy," said lead researcher Feijun Luo, a health economist at the CDC’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. "The strongest association between business cycles and suicides was among working-age people 25 to 64 years old," he said. Co-author Dr. Alexander E. Crosby, a medical epidemiologist said economic hardship may trigger suicidal impulses in those already at risk of killing themselves. "Suicide results from an interaction of a number of different factors," Crosby said. "Other studies have shown there is an association between suicide and unemployment, suicide and economic issues, and it can make vulnerable people more prone to be at risk for suicidal behavior," he said. The report is published online April 14 in the American Journal of Public Health. The researchers found suicide rates increased sharply during the Great Depression, during the oil crisis of 1973-1975, and the double-dip recession of 1980-1982. But fewer people killed themselves during periods of economic expansion, such as the World War Ⅱ and years between 1991 and 2001, when the economy grew rapidly and unemployment was low. To prevent economy-related suicides during economic downturns, communities might want to target programs toward working-age people, Crosby suggested. "Communities can have more support for those age groups that might be laid off," he said. Providing job training, skills training and developing suicide prevention efforts "might be things communities could do," Crosby added. David Rudd, dean of the College of Social and Behavioral Science at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, agreed that those most likely to kill themselves in bad economic times are those already at risk of suicide. "It’s fairly well established that upwards of 90% of those taking their own lives suffer from a diagnosable mental illness at the time, with the overwhelming majority not being in active treatment," he said. The difference in impact across age groups is not a surprise, given that those hardest hit face the most pressing economic demands, Rudd added. "Prevention efforts need to focus on recognition and more effective response to psychiatric illness, particularly in primary care settings," he said. According to Rudd, to prevent suicide we should ______.

On Food Safety, a Long List But Little Money This summer there has been a drumbeat of food-related illnesses. Strawberries containing E. coli (大肠杆菌) killed one person in Oregon and sickened at least nine others. Imported papayas (木瓜) contaminated with salmonella (沙门氏菌) poisoned more than 200 people nationwide, with one dead. The landmark food safety law passed by Congress last December is supposed to reduce the frequency and severity of food safety problems, but the roll call of recent cases underlines the importance of the task. "It’s an enormous undertaking," said Mike Taylor, the Food and Drug Administration’s deputy commissioner for foods, whose job is to turn the far-reaching law into a coherent set of rules that farmers, food processors and importers can follow and regulators can enforce. The agency is taking on the expanded mission at a time when Washington budget-slashing (大幅消减预算) means that regulators have little hope of getting additional money and may instead have their budgets cut by Congress. Mr. Taylor said they didn’t have resources to implement the law. "The choice is we either find the resources or we give up implementing this law. You can’t build something brand-new without the resources to do it. " The agency is now in the process of writing the food safety rules, with the goal of preventing outbreaks like those this summer. One of the most complex jobs involves setting standards for farmers to grow and harvest fruits and vegetables safely. The first draft of the farm rifles is due early next year. The agency is expected to deal with basics like hand-washing stations for field workers, tests of irrigation water and measures to protect fields from wild animals that can track in bacteria. Yet the standards must take into account a huge variety of crops, farming practices and farm sizes. The task is all the more delicate because the agency has never before had a major presence on American farms. For a year and a half, well before Congress passed the food safety law, Mr. Taylor has visited farmers around the country and sought to ease their fears that an army of food safety officials will come storming through their fields telling them how to do their jobs. Recently, he visited Long Island, where he traveled through the sandy fields of the 30-acre Deer Run lettuce farm of Bob Nolan in Brookhaven with steps. Mr. Nolan said he was initially anxious about the new law but was now eager to help the agency make it work for farmers. Mr. Taylor was joined by several agency employees involved in writing the farm rules, and Mr. Nolan told them that he hoped the visit would help them better understand how a farm worked. The complexity of the F. D. A. ’s task became clear as the day went on. At the second stop, a potato farm in Riverhead, the owner Jimmy Zilnicki said that he knew little about what the government expected of him. "We’re all just trying to find out what this food safety thing is all about," he said. Besides, he argued, potatoes were a safe crop and he questioned whether it was worth including them in rood satety rules. Mr. Taylor told him the F. D. A. ’s job was to focus most of its efforts where the food safety risks were greatest. The third stop was a 65-acre organic farm in Riverhead, run by Eve Kaplan Walbrecht and her husband, Chris. They grow a dizzying rank of crops, most of which they sell directly to customers through farmers’ markets and buying clubs. They, too, had made costly improvements with an eye toward food safety, including building a large processing shed with a concrete floor, treated water, a bathroom and refrigerated storage. The new law remits (减轻,减免) small farms that average less than $ 500, 000 a year in sales and sell mostly to local customers. But Ms Kaplan Walbrecht said that her farm brings in too much money to qualify for the exemption. She worried that the new law could become a burden for small farmers, either by adding paperwork or by unleashing (不加管束的) regulators with little understanding of how a farm worked. But while farmers worry that the rules will be too severe, food safety advocates worry that budget cuts could render the law toothless. The Congressional Budget Office has said the F. D. A. will need hundreds of millions of dollars in new financing to execute the law, and there appears little chance that Mr. Taylor will get it. The Republican-controlled House of Representatives has passed a budget that largely eliminates new money for the F. D. A. The Democrat-controlled Senate has not made its own proposal. But advocates fear that the new Congressional super committee that is to propose cuts under the debt ceiling deal could further decrease the agency’s finances. A budget freeze or cuts would have the greatest impact on the ambitious increase in inspections called for under the new law, which strengthen each year. "Writing rules is inexpensive; enforcing them is expensive," said David W. Acheson, a former associate commissioner of the F. D. A. who is now a food safety consultant. "There will be a public health impact because enforcement won’t be to the extent they want to do it. " The agency has already said that, without lots of new money, it won’t be able to conduct the thousands of foreign food inspections the law would require after a few years. Increasing domestic inspections would be difficult, too. The F. D. A. has about 1, 000 inspectors trained to visit food establishments but most of them also inspect drug and medical device facilities. Hiring new inspectors or retraining existing ones is costly. So far, Mr. Taylor has won praise for the introduction of the new law. "I’ve never seen the agency go at anything with such enthusiasm," said Carol L. Tucker Foreman, a food policy expert at the Consumer Federation of America. But she feared that without a higher budget, the agency would take shortcuts. The law requires the most frequent inspections at the riskiest facilities and Ms Tucker Foreman questioned whether the agency would simply classify fewer operations as high risk to make its job easier. Mr. Taylor said that would not happen. "We’re not going to game the system," he said. Why does the agency have no enough resources to implement the food safety law according to Mr. Taylor

核心流动资产指的是在资产负债表上始终存在的那一部分流动资产。 ( )