题目内容
讨论：功利主义与尊重人理论之间是完全对立的吗？如何协调这两个理论之间的矛盾？
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
Reporter:Chinahasdeliveredseveraldecadesofdouble-digit growth and recently 1Japan tobecometheworld'ssecondlargesteconomy.CanChinasustainthisperformance?Howisitpossibletosustainthishighlevelof2yearafteryear?Howreliableisthedatainanycase?Jack:Thetransitionfrom an agricultural to an industrial economy, particularly on the scale we are seeinginChina,leadstoenormous3gains.Growthinthepast has been driven by investment from other countries and China has typically been the largest 4 for FDI. the government has also been an enormous investor into 5 and these projects then pave the way for future increases in productivity. Going forward, the shift will be for China to develop as a consuming nation.Is this sustainable? Yes. There is a great deal of 6 behind this trend. That doesn't mean, however, that there will not be bumps in the road. Generally, with some reservations, you can trust the numbers coming out of China, and in many cases, there is corroborating evidence to support them.Reporter:When discussing China it is a mistake to speak about it in a uniform voice. Can you talk about the differences between the North and South? The Coast and Inland regions?Jack:China has had tremendous growth, but it has been 7 . The biggest growth has been along the coast and in major cities such as Guangdong, Shanghai and Beijing. They have had the fastest growth, and there has been growth 8， but it has not been as dramatic. Between North and South, people will say the South is more business-oriented and easier, and those generalizations are useful, though not 100% 9 . There are differences in the cost structures between different areas which can be very 10 .Companies like Foxconn, which makes ipads, are moving their factories from the south into the inner provinces.
情景：(1)先前的飞船飞行证实了密封环受到了损毁，NASA和聚硫橡胶公司的反应都是接受这个异常，而不是努力去补救或解决导致异常的问题。(2)1977年，测验结果显示SRB的接口在点火时会被旋开，从而在燃料箱和U形沟槽之间产生一个巨大的缺口。根据NASA程师的研究，如果在点火循环的后期初级0形环被损毁，那么这个巨大的缺口将足以使二级密封变得不可能。虽然如此，在经过一些修改(如在O形环背面增加封油灰)后，尽管接口的状态已经偏离了设计时的预期值，但官方还是认定接口的风险是可接受的风险。(3)1981年11月，在STS-2航天飞机飞行后人们发现了另一个异常，在右侧的SRB尾部接口的初级O形环受到了“冲击性侵蚀”。炽热的推进气体穿透了接口处的锌铭酸盐封油灰中的“孔腔。这个孔腔是由涂抹封油灰时被困气体产生的。尽管这个令人困扰的现象原先并未被预测到，但是接口处的风险还是再次被认为是可接受的。(4)1984年STS-41-B航天飞机发射期间，当时第一次发现两个不同接口上的初级O形环都受到侵蚀。同样，这两个接口处的侵蚀也被认为是可以接受的风险建(5)1985年还出现了一个异常，当时“渗漏"的炽热气体已经到达密封固态火箭助推器喷嘴接口的二级密封层。喷嘴接口被认为是安全的，因为它们与表面的接口不同，它们有一个非常不同的而且十分安全的二级密封层——“表面密封"。问题在于，类似的故障还会在表面接口处发生，并且危害要严重得多。然而,这些问题并没有得到处理。(6)在“挑战者号”发射之前，发射时密封层的最低温度应是53°F(此时外围环境的温度高达60°F)。不过，在“挑战者号"发射的前一晚，密封件的温度预计为29°F,环境温度低于冰点。这样，可接受风险的范围被扩大了24°F。结果是导致了“挑战者号"毁灭性的灾难和全体宇航员的遇难。问题：这个问题说明了什么？
用于呆小症的药物( )
能抑制T4转化为T3的是( )
微信支付 
支付宝支付