关于刑法修正案,下列说法正确的是:()A.刑法修正案与刑法典、单行刑法和附属刑法,都是我国刑法的渊关于刑法修正案,下列说法正确的是:()
A. 刑法修正案与刑法典、单行刑法和附属刑法,都是我国刑法的渊源
B. 目前我国共有7个刑法修正案,这7个修正案不但有对刑法分则具体罪名的增删或修改,也对刑法总则的个别条文进行了修改
C. 所有的7个修正案都明显具有“重刑主义”倾向,即“入罪”或“加重法定刑”的规定居多,而“出罪”或“降低法定刑”的规定十分罕见
D. 《刑法修正案(七)》将绑架罪的法定最低刑由10年有期徒刑降至3年有期徒刑,使绑架罪与故意杀人罪的刑罚基本保持一致,同时将巨额财产来源不明罪的法定最高刑由5年有期徒刑升至10年有期徒刑。这些规定,都很好地体现和贯彻了“宽严相济刑事政策”
关于刑事管辖权,下列说法正确的是:()A.凡是实施了国际条约所规定的侵犯各国共同利益的犯罪的犯罪关于刑事管辖权,下列说法正确的是:()
A. 凡是实施了国际条约所规定的侵犯各国共同利益的犯罪的犯罪人,我国既有权利也有义务对其进行管辖,这是普遍管辖原则的要求。因此,即使这样的犯罪人身处国外,我国也能对其进行追诉和审判
B. 外国人在中华人民共和国领域内犯罪的,我国一律可以根据属地管辖的原则,对其适用我国刑法
C. 凡在中华人民共和国领域外犯罪,依照我国刑法应当负刑事责任的,虽经外国审判,仍然可以依照我国刑法进行追究;但是在外国已经受过刑罚处罚的,可以减轻或者免除处罚
D. 犯罪行为或犯罪结果有一项发生在我国领域内就属于在我国领域内犯罪,适用我国刑法。因此,犯罪行为和犯罪结果均在我国领域内发生的,自然更应该适用我国刑法。这不仅是属地管辖原则的必然要求,同时也是刑法当然解释的必然结果
The newspaper must provide for the reader the facts, unalloyed, unslanted, objectively selected facts. But in these days of complex news it must provide more; it must supply interpretation, the meaning of the facts. This is the most important assignment confronting American journalism to make clear to the reader the problems of the day, to make international news as understandable as community news, to recognize that there is no longer any such thing (with the possible exception of such scribbling as society and club news) as "local" news, because any events in the international area has a local reaction in manpower draft, in economic strain, in terms, indeed', of our very way of life.
There is in journalism a widespread view that when you embark on interpretation, you are entering choppy and dangerous waters, the swirling tides of opinion. This is nonsense.
The opponents of interpretation insist that the writer and the editor shall confine himself to the "facts". This insistence raises two questions :What are the facts? And: Are the bare facts enough?
As to the first query, consider how a so-called "factual" story comes about. The reporter collects, say, fifty facts; out of these fifty, his space allotment being necessarily restricted, he selects the ten which he considers most important. This is Judgment Number One. Then he or his editor decides which of these ten facts shall constitute the lead of the piece. (This is an important decision because many readers do not proceed beyond the first paragraph. ) This is Judgment Number Two. Then the night editor determines whether the article shall be presented on page one, where it has a large impact, or on page twenty-four, where it has little, Judgment Number Three.
Thus, in the presentation of a so-called "factual" or "objective" story, at least three judgments are involved. And they are judgments not at all unlike those involved in interpretation, in which re porter and editor, calling upon their research resources, their general background, and their "news neutralism" ,arrive at a conclusion as to the significance of the news.
The two areas of judgment, presentation of the news and its interpretation, are both objective rather than subjective processes--as objective, that is, as any human being can be. (Note in passing: even though complete objectivity can never be achieved, nevertheless the ideal must always be the beacon on the murky news channels. ) If an editor is intent on slanting the news, he can do it in other ways and more effectively than by interpretation. He can do it by the selection of those facts that prop up his particular plea: Or he can do it by the place he gives a story--promoting it to page one or demoting it to page thirty.
According to the author, what will the newspaper do if it provides interpretation?
A. To select the most important news.
B. To report news without bias.
C. To show the meaning of the facts.
D. To focus on international news.
The most extensive attempt to modify Type A behavioral patterns has been carded out in the San Francisco Bay area, where 600 men who have suffered heart attacks are participating in an ongoing study. The treatment consists of a variety of approaches which are intended to modify both the perception of stress and the reaction to stress.
Subjects have been taught to observe their own behavior. to change and manage their thinking a bout once-stressful occurrences, making them neutral by interpreting them in ways that do not evoke stress. Thus instead of fuming about the time they are wasting in a traffic jam, Type A's ought to think about the opportunity to think over their day's activities. They also have been told to adopt new, relaxing hobbies that are entirely separate from their careers, and they are learning procedures that will al low them to modify their physiological reactions through such techniques as deep muscle relaxation and learning to slow down physical activity.
Still, there is no definitive evidence to date showing that reductions in Type A characteristics result invariably in a decrease in heart disease risk. Moreover, it is unclear just which aspect of Type A behavior. is the crucial one, or whether it is a complex of several behaviors, all part of the Type A pat tern ,that is associated with the increased risk. In other words ,we still do not know specifically what it is about Type A behaviors that leads to heart problems, and until we do, programs that attempt to de crease the risk must use relatively expensive and time-consuming procedures, modifying essentially all manifestations of the Type A pattern. Moreover, programs which emphasize the importance of work and achievement. For these reasons, treatment programs that are designed to alter Type A behaviors may be facing an uphill battle.
Despite the difficulty in implementing treatment programs to reduce the Type A behavior. pattern, such attempts illustrate quite clearly the role that social psychologists can play in the treatment of health problems.
What is the attitude of the author towards the Type A behavior?
A. Optimistic.
B. Worried.
C. Unrealistic.
D. Indifferent.