问答题
Section A – BOTH questions are compulsory and MUST be attempted<br>Mackerel Contracting (Mackerel) is a listed defence contractor working mainly for its domestic government in Zedland. At present, Mackerel is considering tendering for a contract to design and develop a new armoured personnel vehicle (APV) for the army to protect its soldiers during transport around a battlefield. The invitation to tender from the government specifies that the APV should take two years to develop and test, and be delivered for a full cost to Mackerel of no more than $70,000 per unit at current prices before Mackerel’s profit element. Normally, government contracts are approximately priced on a cost plus basis with Mackerel aiming to make a 19% mark-up.<br>At the last briefing meeting, the institutional shareholders of Mackerel expressed concern about the volatility of the company’s earnings (currently a $20·4m operating profit per annum) especially during the economic downturn which is affecting Zedland at present. They are also concerned by cuts in government expenditure resulting from this recession. The Zedland minister for procurement has declared ‘In the current difficult economic conditions, we are preparing a wide ranging review of all defence contracts with a view to deciding on what is desirable within the overall priorities for Zedland and what is possible within our budget.’ The government procurement manager has indicated that the government would be willing to commit to purchase 500 APVs within the price limit set but with the possibility of increasing this to 750 or 1,000 depending on defence commitments. In the invitation to tender document, the government has stated it will pay a fixed sum of $7·5m towards development and then a 19% mark-up on budgeted variable costs.<br>Mackerel’s risk management committee (RMC) is considering how much to spend on design and development. It has three proposals from the engineering team: a basic design package (Type 1) and two other improved design packages (Type 2 and Type 3). The design packages will have different total fixed costs but are structured to give the same variable cost per unit. The basic design package will cost $7·5m to develop which will satisfy the contract specification. It is believed that the improved design packages will increase the chances of gaining a larger government order but it has been very difficult to ascertain the relevant probabilities of different order volumes. The RMC need a full appraisal of the situation using all suitable methods.<br>The risk manager has gathered information on the APV contract which is contained in appendix A. She has identified that a major uncertainty in pricing the vehicle is the price of steel, as each APV requires 9·4 tonnes of steel. However, she has been successful in negotiating a fixed price contract for all the steel that might be required at $1,214 per tonne. The risk manager has tried to estimate the effect of choosing different design packages but is unsure of how to proceed to evaluate the different options.<br>You are a consultant brought in to advise Mackerel on the new contract. The RMC need a report which outlines the external factors affecting the profitability of the project and how these factors can be built into the choice of the design budget which is ultimately set.<br>Required:<br>Write a report to the risk management committee to:<br>(i) Analyse the risks facing the management of Mackerel and discuss how the management team’s attitude to risk might affect their response; (9 marks)<br>(ii) Evaluate the APV project using metrics and methods for decision-making under risk and uncertainty and assess the suitability of the different methods used; (19 marks)<br>(iii) Recommend an appropriate choice of method of assessing the project and, therefore, a course of action for the APV contract. (3 marks) Professional marks will be awarded for the format, style. and structure of the discussion of your answer. (4 marks)
问答题
PLX Refinery Co is a large oil refinery business in Kayland. Kayland is a developing country with a large and growing oil exploration and production business which supplies PLX with crude oil. Currently, the refinery has the capacity to process 200,000 barrels of crude oil per day and makes profits of $146m per year. It employs about 2,000 staff and contractors. The staff are paid $60,000 each per year on average (about twice the national average pay in Kayland).<br>The government of Kayland has been focused on delivering rapid economic growth over the last 15 years. However, there are increasing signs that the environment is paying a large price for this growth with public health suffering. There is now a growing environmental pressure group, Green Kayland (GK), which is organising protests against the companies that they see as being the major polluters.<br>Kayland’s government wishes to react to the concerns of the public and the pressure groups. It has requested that companies involved in heavy industry contribute to a general improvement in the treatment of the environment in Kayland.<br>As a major participant in the oil industry with ties to the nationalised oil exploration company (Kayex), PLX believes it will be strategically important to be at the forefront of environmental developments. It is working with other companies in the oil industry to improve environmental reporting since there is a belief that this will lead to improved public perception and economic efficiency of the industry. PLX has had a fairly good compliance record in Kayland, with only two major fines being levied in the last eight years for safety breaches and river pollution ($1m each).<br>The existing information systems within PLX focus on financial performance. They support financial reporting obligations and allow monitoring of key performance metrics such as earnings per share and operating margins. Recent publications on environmental accounting have suggested there are a number of techniques (such as input/output analysis, activity-based costing (ABC) and a lifecycle view) that may be relevant in implementing improvements to these systems.<br>PLX is considering a major capital expenditure programme to enhance capacity, safety and efficiency at the refinery. This will involve demolishing certain older sections of the refinery and building on newly acquired land adjacent to the site. Overall, the refinery will increase its land area by 20%.<br>Part of the refinery extension will also manufacture a new plastic, Kayplas. Kayplas is expected to have a limited market life of five years after which it will be replaced by Kayplas2. The refinery accounting team have forecast the following data associated with this product and calculated PLX’s traditional performance measure of product profit for the new product:<br>All figures are $m’s<br>Subsequently, the following environmental costs have been identified from PLX’s general overheads as associated with Kayplas production.<br>Additionally, other costs associated with closing down and recycling the equipment in Kayplas production are estimated at $18m in 2016.<br>The board wishes to consider how it can contribute to the oil industry’s performance in environmental accounting, how it can implement the changes that this might require and how these changes will benefit the company.<br>Required:<br>(a) Discuss different cost categories that would aid transparency in environmental reporting both internally and externally at PLX. (4 marks)<br>(b) Explain and evaluate how the three environmental accounting techniques mentioned can assist in managing the environmental and strategic performance of PLX. (9 marks)<br>(c) Evaluate the costing approach used for Kayplas’s performance compared to a lifecycle costing approach, performing appropriate calculations. (7 marks)
问答题
Thin Co is a private hospital offering three types of surgical procedures known as A, B and C. Each of them uses a pre-operative injection given by a nurse before the surgery. Thin Co currently rent an operating theatre from a neighbouring government hospital. Thin Co does have an operating theatre on its premises, but it has never been put into use since it would cost $750,000 to equip. The Managing Director of Thin Co is keen to maximise profits and has heard of something called ‘throughput accounting’, which may help him to do this. The following information is available:<br>1 All patients go through a five step process, irrespective of which procedure they are having:<br>– step 1: consultation with the advisor;<br>– step 2: pre-operative injection given by the nurse;<br>– step 3: anaesthetic given by anaesthetist;<br>–step 4: procedure performed in theatre by the surgeon;<br>– step 5: recovery with the recovery specialist.<br>2 The price of each of procedures A, B and C is $2,700, $3,500 and $4,250 respectively.<br>3 The only materials’ costs relating to the procedures are for the pre-operative injections given by the nurse, the anaesthetic and the dressings. These are as follows:<br>4 There are five members of staff employed by Thin Co. Each works a standard 40-hour week for 47 weeks of the year, a total of 1,880 hours each per annum. Their salaries are as follows:<br>– Advisor: $45,000 per annum;<br>– Nurse: $38,000 per annum;<br>– Anaesthetist: $75,000 per annum;<br>– Surgeon: $90,000 per annum;<br>– Recovery specialist: $50,000 per annum.<br>The only other hospital costs (comparable to ‘factory costs’ in a traditional manufacturing environment) are general overheads, which include the theatre rental costs, and amount to $250,000 per annum.<br>5 Maximum annual demand for A, B and C is 600, 800 and 1,200 procedures respectively. Time spent by each of the five different staff members on each procedure is as follows:<br>Part hours are shown as decimals e.g. 0·24 hours = 14·4 minutes (0·24 x 60).<br>Surgeon’s hours have been correctly identified as the bottleneck resource.<br>Required:<br>(a) Calculate the throughput accounting ratio for procedure C.<br>Note: It is recommended that you work in hours as provided in the table rather than minutes. (6 marks)<br>(b) The return per factory hour for products A and B has been calculated and is $2,612·53 and $2,654·40 respectively. The throughput accounting ratio for A and B has also been calculated and is 8·96 and 9·11 respectively.<br>Calculate the optimum product mix and the maximum profit per annum. (7 marks)<br>(c) Assume that your calculations in part (b) showed that, if the optimum product mix is adhered to, there will be excess demand for procedure C of 696 procedures per annum. In order to satisfy this excess demand, the company is considering equipping and using its own theatre, as well as continuing to rent the existing theatre. The company cannot rent any more theatre time at either the existing theatre or any other theatres in the area, so equipping its own theatre is the only option. An additional surgeon would be employed to work in the newly equipped theatre.<br>Required:<br>Discuss whether the overall profit of the company could be improved by equipping and using the extra theatre.<br>Note: Some basic calculations may help your discussion. (7 marks)
套餐购买该问题答案仅对会员开放,欢迎开通会员 ¥ 19.9
0.64/天
1个月(不限次)
¥ 19.9
1000次
(不限时)
¥ 29.9
0.32/天
3个月(不限次)
¥ 59.9
0.16/天
1年(不限次)
立即支付