题目内容

The notorious Yasuknni Shrine in Tokyo on Saturday made fallacious claim that the 14 World War II Class-A war criminals it enshrines are no longer war criminals in Japan.According to a written statement of the shrine in response to the interview of Tokyo News, the Yasukuni Shrine doubted the just sentence on the war criminals by the International Military Tribunal for the Far East after the WWII, saying the IMTFE sentence is not unconditional correct."Japan has revised related laws to grant pension to families of those convicted war criminals as well as the ordinary war dead, both are called the dead of official duty," the shrine claimed. "In this term, the war criminals are no longer regarded as criminals in Japan because the government never grants pensions to criminals."Yasukuni also rejected the call at home and abroad to establish new national memorial to separate enshrinement of the Class-A war criminals from the ordinary war dead in the shrine, raging Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi to continue his Yasukuni visits.Many Asian countries have strongly protested Japanese leaders’ visits to the Yasukuni Shrine, which honors the Class-A war criminals responsible for Japan’s aggression war against its Asian neighbors.Koizumi has paid annual visits to the shrine since he took office in 2001. Which statement was not true().

A. Japan had revised related laws to grant pension to the family of these convicted war criminals.
B. Some people at home and abroad called Yasukuni to establish new memorial to separate war criminals from ordinary war dead
C. Koizumi took office in 2001.
D. Yasukuni hadn’t make response to the call of separating war criminals from ordinary dead.

查看答案
更多问题

听下面5段对话或独白。每段对话或独白后有几个小题,从题中所给的[A]、[B]、[C]三个选项中选出最佳选项,并标在试卷的相应位置。听每段对话或独白前,你将有5秒钟的时间阅读各个小题;听完后,各小题将给出5秒钟的作答时间。每段对话或独白读两遍。 What is the woman going to do

A. [A] She is going to attend the regional meeting.
B. She is going to see a film.
C. She is going to have a night class.

What would they like to have

A. [A] Hamburger, a glass of Pepsi, an ice-cream cone, an apple pie.
B. Hamburger, fish, chicken soup.
C. Hamburger, chicken soup, an apple pie.

粉尘爆炸属于( )反应。日本安全工学协会编的《爆炸》一书中阐述了一种比较典型的粉尘爆炸机理:粉尘粒子通过热传导和热辐射,从火源获得能量,使( )温度急剧升高,达到粉尘粒子加速分解的温度和蒸发温度,形成粉尘蒸气,这种气体与空气混合后容易( )。

A. 还原;内部;释放大量能量
B. 氧化;表面;压力急剧升高
C. 气固二相流;表面;引起点火
D. 放热;内部和表面;造成能量形式急剧转化

Denis: Hello, everyone. Welcome again to Consumer’s Choice, which is the last program in our present series. Isn’t that right, WendyWendy: Yes, that’s right. But we’ll be back again after summer break with a new series. We’ll tell you more about that later. But, first, in today’s program, we start off with the missing photographs. The story of how a listener’s determination has qualified her for our Consumer of the Month award, DenisDenis: Thank you, Wendy. This is the story of Miss Patty China who went on a holiday to Europe last month. This was her first ever trip abroad and one for which she’d been saving for 10 years. Her tour took her around 12 countries in 21 days. And being a keen photographer, she took lots of photographs; ten rolls of films, to be exact. About 360 photographs. When Patty got back home, she gave all her photos to Top-class Photo services for developing. And they vanished. She never saw them again. Of course, she was furious with the company and complained. They apologized and offered her compensation: l0 free rolls of films. This made her angry as ever. And she rejected this completely inadequate offer and asked for 2,000 dollars. The company refused her request. So Patty wrote them a letter, telling them to pay up in ten days or she would take them to court. She received no reply. So she did take them to court. But 2 days before the case was due to be heard, she received a cheque for 2,000 dollars. Top-class had obviously made their minds up on how the judge would decide. Patty’s case provides a lesson to us all. If we want our rights as consumers, we’ve got to fight for them. So for her determination and spirit we name Patty our Consumer of the Month.Wendy: Thank you, Denis. And now I’d like to deal with the problem that many of our listeners write about. Sale prices. When we go to a sale and see a sign on something saying 50 percent off or 300 dollars reduced to 100 how do we know the prices really have been reduced One of our listeners, Mr. Alvin Lok tells his story:" In a department store where I sometimes shopped, I saw a leather belt priced at 100 dollars. Too expensive to me. But I liked it and thought I might buy it next time the store had a sale. The store did have a sale. And I went back to look for the belt. It was there all right. But the ticket on it now read 200 dollars reduced to 150. The sale price was actually higher than the normal price. What can we, as consumers, do in a case like this The answer to Alvin’s question is that at the moment all we can do is to complain to the store’s management and bring these cases to the attention of the public. Bad publicity might help to put a stop to this dishonest practice. But Consumer’s choice will continue to press for the government to bring in laws similar to those in other countries to protect consumers by making it illegal to cheat them in this way. And now I’d like to tell you about our new consumer hot-line which came to operation Last month. So far we have received... The Consumer of the Month is().

A. Denis
B. Wendy
C. Patty
D. Alvin

答案查题题库