题目内容
近年来广告费用增速最快的媒体是（）。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
内部营销主要包括
Part of the discussion section of a research article from the field of energy transition is given below. Choose the appropriate sentences to make the discussion section complete.a.We make three contributions to the literature on energy transitions.b.In our empirical case, we identified nine emerging storylines that reflect the expectations of key actors in the energy sector.c.The aim of this paper was to understand what kinds of expectations a novel business model developed by a hybrid actor can generate.d.In addition, research could further test the value of discourse analysis in exploring the potential implications of various business models.e.Our analysis thus shows that new business models can also challenge the regime, which reinforces the results of previous research in which business model innovations in niches can stretch the regulatory regime (Huijben, Verbong & Podoynitsna, 2016).Farm Power: How a New Business Model Impacts the Energy Transition in Finland1 The role of hybrid actors in the energy transition deserves more in-depth research since those actors have the potential to create provisional links between novel solutions and the dominant market logics of the incumbent regime. While the role of businesses models in sustainabilitytransitions has recently gained interest in the strategic niche management literature (Hörisch, 2018; Bidmon & Knab, 2018; Huijben & Verbong, 2013), the perspectives brought up by novel business models introduced by hybrid actors have not been widely explored. Our perspective follows the insight that business models are novel industry recipes that are used to influence expectations, challenge contemporary rules and offer alternative ways to produce and use energy in the energy transition. This approach highlights the need to understand how expectations about user preferences and market rules evolve between and inside the niche and regime levels. 2 The storylines we identified offer an elaboration on how the new line of business, launched by a hybrid actor, calls into question deep-seated beliefs and creates pressure for reconsidering institutionalised rules, also among representatives of the dominant regime.The Farm Power business model was perceived very differently when discussed from the perspective of the niche innovation itself or in relation to the rules of the dominant regime. The sympathetic, fun and small service on the niche level appears as a potentially dangerous and powerful rhetorical tool when considered in terms of the rules of the dominant regime.3 We found that the Farm Power business model challenged the regime, in particular, by questioning the position of cheap electricity as a political priority. We found that the longstanding industrialist discourse (Teräväinen, 2010) was challenged by a storyline that defined the low price of electricity as harmful for distributed renewable energy generation, new investments and the energy transition. This is an interesting finding, since such expectations are subject to the path dependency and the slow change of normative and discursive fields.4 First, we extend the concept of hybrid actors (Hörisch, 2018; Elzen, Van Mierlo & Leeuwis, 2012) to the energy sector, where the battle between incumbents and new entrants has mainly been understood in terms of pre-defined interests (Richter, 2013; Hess, 2015). Our extreme case shows how incumbents can create provisional links between niche and regime logics, promote renewable energy and influence expectations through business development, but cannot have strategic control over ensuing expectations and interpretations. With this, we do not contest analyses of strategic interests, but offer an additional perspective that interests can also be ambiguous and emergent. Second, we elaborate on Elzen’s and colleagues’ (Elzen, Van Mierlo & Leeuwis, 2012) concept of institutional anchoring by making a close analysis of the changing expectations concerning institutional rules and beliefs articulated as a result of the launch of a new business model. We show how certain institutional rules, like the primacy of cheap energy, are called into question, while others such as the role of markets vs. subsidies are given new interpretations. Third, we extend current business model research within the strategic niche management tradition by focusing on expectations engendered by the creation and materialization of new “industry recipes” (Bidmon & Knob, 2018). We thus suggest that business models are not of interest only for business, but also have implications for the terms of market competition (e.g., cost vs. product differentiation),for consumers and producers (anonymous vs. localized and personalized production), and for policy (design of support schemes and infrastructures for the energy transition). In particular, we highlight the experimental and exemplary nature of new business models in a transitional phase of the energy sector, when they have the potential to spark imaginations and (at least provisionally) materialize alternative transition pathways.Further research on how novel business models influence expectations in the energy transition could cast light on how incumbent companies might survive the reconstruction of the sector, and what rules and beliefs need to change in order for this to occur. Our snapshot research has identified a branching point, where alternative business logics are at least provisionally possible in the energy sector: time will tell whether these are materialized. 5 This could be valuable since market insiders might not recognize how new business models challenge or extend established beliefs and rules, and what kinds of tensions they might entail (Hajer, 1995). In addition, such knowledge could help in the development of new and different policies to support business models that advance the energy transition towards sustainability.
27.急性血源性骨髓炎延误诊治的后果是发生
26.下列关于骨和关节结核的描述，不正确的是
微信支付 
支付宝支付