题目内容

The following information should be used when answering question one.
1 Origins and ownership
Churchill Ice Cream is a medium-sized family owned company, making and selling a range of premium ice cream
products. Its origins were in the middle years of the twentieth century, when John Churchill saw an opportunity to
supply a growing consumer demand for luxury products. John has been followed into the business by his two sons
and the Churchill family has dominated the ownership and management of the company. In 2001 there was
recognition of the need to bring in outside management expertise and John reluctantly accepted the need to relinquish
his position as chairman and chief executive of the company. Richard Smith, formerly a senior executive with one of
the major supermarket chains, was appointed as chief executive. Within one year of Richard’s appointment he had
recruited Churchill’s first sales and marketing director. Richard was consciously looking to reduce the dominance by
the Churchill family and make the company a more marketing orientated business able to meet the increased
competitive challenges of the 21st century.
Churchill’s distinctive strategy
Churchill Ice Cream is in many ways an unusual company, choosing to both manufacture its premium ice cream and
sell its products through its own stores. Specialist ice cream stores or parlours had started in the US and soon spread
to the UK. Customers can both buy and eat ice cream in the store. John Churchill saw the growing demand for such
specialist ice cream stores and created a unique store format, which quickly established the Churchill brand. Most of
these stores are owned by the company, but there are also some smaller franchised outlets. By 2005 it had 40 ice
cream stores owned by the company and a further 18 owned by franchise holders. Franchise stores typically are in
less attractive locations than their company-owned equivalents. All stores are located in and around the London area.
The logic for manufacturing its own ice cream is a strongly held belief that through sourcing its ingredients from local
farmers and suppliers it gains a significant competitive advantage. Making its own ice cream also has enabled it to
retain control over the unique recipes used in its premium ice cream product range. John Churchill summed up the
policy saying ‘We are no more expensive than the market leader but we are much better. We use real chocolate and
it’s real dairy ice cream. Half our expenditure goes on our ingredients and packaging. It’s by far our highest cost.’ Dairy
ice cream, as opposed to cheaper ice cream, uses milk, butter and cream instead of vegetable oils to blend with sugar
and flavourings. These ingredients are blended to produce a wide range of products. Churchill has also developed a
product range with no artificial additives hoping to differentiate itself from the competition.
Product innovation is a key capability in the ice cream market and 40% of industry sales are made from products less
than three years old. Churchill’s products are made at a new purpose built factory and supplied quickly and directly
to its own ice cream stores and other retail outlets. Unfortunately, detailed and timely information about product and
store performance has suffered through a delay in introducing a management information system. Consequently its
stores often faced product shortages during the peak summer months.
In 2003 Churchill became the sponsor and sole supplier to a number of high profile summer sporting events held in
London. Churchill also supplies eight million tubs of ice cream each year to London based cinemas and theatres. As
a consequence, Churchill is now an established regional brand with 90% customer recognition in the London area.
It also has major ambitions to become a national and eventually an international brand though facing significant
competition from two global chains of US owned premium ice cream stores. Their high profile moves into the UK
market was backed with expensive advertising and succeeded in expanding the demand for all premium ice creams.
The UK retail ice cream market
Ice cream is bought in two main ways: either from retail outlets such as supermarkets for later consumption at home
or on impulse for immediate consumption from a range of outlets, including ice cream stores such as Churchill’s.
Impulse sales are much more dependent on the weather and in 2003 sales of take home ice cream and impulse ice
cream were roughly equal. Total sales of ice cream in the UK reached £1·3 billion in 2003. Premium ice cream in
2005 accounted for 19% of the UK’s take home market, up from 15% in 2002.
Churchill itself does not use advertising. In John Churchill’s words, ‘There is no point in advertising your product if
consumers are unable to buy the product.’ Churchill has yet to achieve significant sales into the take home market.
Two major barriers exist. Firstly, global manufacturers with significant global brands dominate the industry. Secondly,
four major UK supermarket chains dominate the take home market. These supermarket chains account for over 80%
of food spending in the UK and have the power to demand that suppliers manufacture their products under the
supermarket’s own label brand. Supermarkets currently account for 41% of the sales of ice cream in the UK.
However, it is proving difficult to get the Churchill product range into the ice cream cabinets of the supermarket chains.
In John Churchill’s opinion ‘If you want to buy a tub of premium ice cream and you go to a supermarket you have a
choice of two American brands or its own label. I think there should be a British brand in there. Our prices are
competitive, at least £1 cheaper than our rivals and our aim is to get Churchill ice cream into every major
supermarket.’ Some limited success has been achieved with two of the smaller supermarket chains with premium ice
cream supplied under their own label brands. However, margins are very slim on these sales.
Churchill’s international strategy
Churchill, in seeking to increase its sales, has had no success in moving into foreign markets. In the 1990s it tried
both setting up its own ice cream stores abroad and acquiring specialist ice cream makers with their own ice cream
outlets. Its attempted entry into the US market was by using the established Churchill ice cream store format. Two
stores were opened in New York, but the hopes that the emphasis on classic English quality and style. and the slogan
‘tradition with taste’, would prove successful did not materialise and the stores were closed with significant losses –
each store took upwards of £100K to fit out.
Acquisition of two established ice cream makers, one in Germany and one in Italy also proved failures. Access to their
retail outlets and to complementary product ranges did not overcome differences in taste and customer buying
behaviour. Despite attempts to change some of the German and Italian outlets to the Churchill store format the resultswere less than impressive and the two companies were eventually sold at a combined loss of £5 million.
Summary
Overall, Churchill has a distinctive strategy linking the manufacturing of premium ice cream with its distribution
through the company’s own ice cream stores. This has secured them a regional reputation for a quality product. It
has had little success to date in penetrating the major supermarket chains with the Churchill brand and in moving its
distinctive ice cream store format into foreign markets. Finally, to complicate both the manufacturing and retail sides
of the Churchill business, seasonality is a real issue. Ice cream is still heavily dominated by sales in the summer
months. In fact the peak demand in summer is typically five times the demand in the middle of winter. Equally serious
is the impact of a cold summer on impulse ice cream sales. This has a number of consequences, which affect the
costs of the product and capacity usage at both manufacturing and retail levels.
Despite this, Richard Smith has set three clear strategic goals to be achieved over the next five years. Firstly, to become
the leading premium ice cream brand in the UK, secondly, to increase sales to £25 million and finally, to penetrate
the supermarket sector with the Churchill product range.
Required:
Richard Smith has set three clear strategic goals for Churchill’s growth and development over the next five years.
(a) Using models where appropriate, assess the advantages and disadvantages of the current strategy being
pursued by Churchill Ice Cream and its impact on performance up to 2005. (20 marks)

查看答案
更多问题

company (MM) has decided that this is insufficient and has put a small team together to re-design the site. MM feels
that the site looks ‘amateur and old-fashioned and does not project the right image’. The board of the company has
given the go-ahead for the MM ‘to re-design the website’. The following notes summarise the outcomes of the
meetings on the website re-design. The team consists of the marketing manager (MM), a product range manager (RP),
a marketing image consultant (IC) and a technical developer (TD).
Meeting 1: 9 July attended by MM, RP, IC and TD
The need for a re-designed website to increase sales volume through the website and to ‘improve our market visibility’
was explained by MM. IC was asked to produce a draft design.
Meeting 2: 16 August attended by MM, RP, IC and TD
IC presented a draft design. MM and RP were happy with its image but not its functionality, suggesting that it was
too similar to the current site. ‘We expected it to do much more’ was their view.
Meeting 3: 4 September attended by MM, RP and IC
IC produced a re-drafted design. This overall design was agreed and the go-ahead was given for TD to produce a
prototype of the design to show to the board.
Meeting 4: 11 September attended by RP, IC and TD
TD explained that elements of the drafted re-design were not technically feasible to implement in the programming
language being used. Changes to the design were agreed at the meeting to overcome these issues and signed off by
RP.
Meeting 5: 13 October attended by MM, RP, IC and TD
The prototype re-design was demonstrated by TD. MM was unhappy with the re-design as it was ‘moving too far away
from the original objective and lacked functionality that should be there’. TD agreed to write a technical report to
explain why the original design (agreed on 4 September) could not be adhered to.
Meeting 6: 9 November attended by MM, IC and TD
It was agreed to return to the 4 September design with slight alterations to make it technically feasible. TD expressed
concerns that the suggested design would not work properly with all web browsers.
At the board meeting of 9 December the board expressed concern about the time taken to produce the re-design and
the finance director highlighted the rising costs (currently $25,000) of the project. They asked MM to produce a
formal cost-benefit of the re-design. The board were also concerned that the scope of the project, which they had felt
to be about re-design, had somehow been interpreted as including development and implementation.
On 22 December MM produced the following cost-benefit analysis of the project and confirmed that the word ‘redesignhad been interpreted as including the development and implementation of the website
On 4 January the board gave the go ahead for the development and implementation of the website with a further
budget of $25,000 and a delivery date of 1 March. TD expressed concern that he did not have enough developers
to deliver the re-designed website on time.
Meeting 7: 24 February attended by MM, RP, IC and TD
A partial prototype system was demonstrated by TD. RP felt that the functionality of the re-design was too limited and
that the software was not robust enough. It had crashed twice during the demonstration. He suggested that the
company delay the introduction of the re-designed website until it was complete and robust. MM declared this to be
impossible.
Conclusion
The re-designed website was launched on 1 March. MM declared the re-design a success that ‘had come in on time
and under budget’. On 2 and 3 March, numerous complaints were received from customers. The website was
unreliable and did not work with a particular popular web browser. On 4 March an emergency board meeting decided
to withdraw the site and reinstate the old one. On 5 March, MM resigned.
Required:
Most project management methods have an initiation or definition stage which includes the production of a document
that serves as an agreement between the sponsors and deliverers of the project. This may be called a project initiation
document or a project charter. Defining the business case is also an important part of the initiation or definition stage
of the project.
(a) Explain how a business case and a project initiation document would have helped prevent some of the
problems that emerged during the conduct of the website re-design project. (15 marks)

对先张法和后张法的预应力混凝土构件,如果采用相同张拉控制应力σcon值,则 ()。
A 后张法所建立的钢筋有效预应力比先张法小
B 后张法所建立的钢筋有效预应力和先张法相同
C 先张法所建立的钢筋有效预应力比后张法小

轴心受压柱的最常见配筋形式为纵筋及横向箍筋,这是因为()。
A纵筋能帮助混凝土承受压力,以减少构件的截面尺寸
B纵筋能防止构件突然脆裂破坏及增强构件的廷性
C箍筋能与纵筋形成骨架,防止纵筋受力外

截面尺寸和材料强度相同时,钢筋混凝土受弯构件正截面承载力与受拉区纵筋配筋率ρ的关系是()。
A ρ越大,正截面承载力亦越大
B ρ越大,正截面承载力越小
C 当ρmin≤ρ≤ρmax时,ρ越大,正截面承载力越大

答案查题题库