题目内容
师范教育的三类课程（普通教育课程、学科专业课程和教育专业课程）如何保持平衡的问题，一直是师范教育课程研究中的难题。（）
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
In the drawing and cartoons of Uncle Sam 查看材料
苏联解体后，俄联邦政府为适应市场经济发展的需要，打破了原有的单一、僵化的师范教育体制。（）
根据以下内容，回答题。
Passage Five
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators， conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which me likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer"s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However， it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research， number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer"s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could， of course， be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers， it should be their colleagues. However， I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures， but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However， lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author， all the students know that__________. 查看材料
美国没有全国统一的学前教育机构管理标准与条例。（）
微信支付 
支付宝支付