题目内容
成本收益分析法是将（ ）与流动成本联系在一起。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
阑尾作为免疫器官，可参与产生和促进成熟的细胞是
若以上检查未发现可疑病灶，下一步最恰当的处理为下面的题目共用题干55岁，女性，孕5产5，绝经5年，阴道不规则出血1个月。妇科检查：外阴阴道正常，宫颈肥大、糜烂、触之易出血，子宫后屈、稍大，双侧附件未见异常该患者绝经后最可能的出血原因是
以下药物中，作为首选“改善病情的抗风湿药”的是根据下面资料，回答下面的题目。类风湿关节炎为不明原因的自身免疫疾病。治疗类风湿关节炎重点不应仅限于镇痛抗炎，更应积极阻止病情的发展。以下抗类风湿药物中，丕属于非甾体抗炎药的是
It can be inferred from Paragraph 5 that the Alien and Sedition Acts根据以下资料，回答下面的题目。On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona’s immigration law Monday-a modest policy victory for the Obama Administration.But on the more important matter of the Constitution,the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration’s effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states.In Arizona v.United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona’s controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law.The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to “establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ”and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial .Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones.Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court’s liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun.On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately “occupied the field” and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal’s privileged powers.However,the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement.That’s because Congress has always envisioned joint federal-state immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues.Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute.The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia,who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts.The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as “a shocking assertion assertion of federal executive power”.The White House argued that Arizona’s laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities,even if state laws complied with federal statutes to the letter.In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with . Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them.But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could.It never did so.The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn’t want to carry out Congress’s immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim. Three provisions of Arizona’s plan were overturned because they
微信支付 
支付宝支付