题目内容
阅读下列短文，回答下列问题。 加拿大某公司建造了一座示范厂，用酒精而不是用硫磺造纸浆。该公司董事长佩蒂说：“这是未来之路，用酒精制造纸浆意味着出现一种清洁、无污染的技术。” 如果在小规模工厂里取得成功的这项技术也能在正式规模的工厂里生产出较便宜的纸浆，它将对纸价产生影响。这项技术还能消除造纸工业常有的臭鸡蛋味——硫化氢的气味。 该公司使用的这种工艺叫ALCELL(即酒精alcohol和纤维素cellulose的合成词)，它使用酒精和水代替硫磺把木材分解成纸浆。这种工艺是加拿大在1972年发明的，以前从来没有实现商品化，但是这家公司希望它能使造纸工业发生彻底变革。 佩蒂说：“建造一座新的纸浆厂要耗资10亿美元，而且它要求木材供应源源不断。如有ALCELL工艺，只要耗资3.5亿美元就能建造一个工厂，并使工厂不停地运转，所需木材供应量较小。”他又说：“那意味着一个工厂一天生产350吨而不是1000吨纸浆。”林业产品分析家邓肯森说：“从环境方面来说，它比较清洁，而且小型厂这个概念将会使建造新纸浆厂变得较容易。”这种工艺取得成功，它将能以较低的成本生产纸浆。 下列说法，不符合原文意思的一项是( )。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
现在小汽车、私家车越来越多，请对这一趋势谈谈你的看法。
取证是指烟草专卖行政主管部门对涉嫌违法的事实、行为和当事人进行询问，核实情况的活动。
The water ________ Manhattan has been very important to New York.
Questions 49-52 Recent intrusions into the lives of public figures have highlighted the lack of laws guarding privacy in Britain. As a result, one issue under discussion as Parliament returns this week is the possible introduction of legislation to curb press powers. The government will probably take no action until it receives a report from a committee chaired by Sir David Calcutt, due in January 1993. the committee is examining whether the press should be regulated by tougher legislation. It is also considering the ways in which the press has invaded the private lives of the famous. The Calcutt committee has reported once before, in 1990. it recommendations led to the creation of the Press Complaints Commission, under which the press was given the chance to regulate itself without the need for a privacy law. It also proposed a new criminal offence of physical intrusion to obtain information for publication. This proposal, which was not acted upon, would have made it unlawful to photograph people on private property to record their conversations without permission. It would have made it an offence to enter a property to place a bug or obtain personal information. The committee said that the press should be allowed to invade the privacy of a public figure only when it was likely to expose or prevent criminal activity, otherwise his or privacy should be left alone. But a general law protecting privacy was rejected. Since then, reports in some newspapers and magazines about people’s private lives have ignored the committee’s recommendations. The private lives of Government Ministers and members of the Royal Family have featured prominently in the press. Photographs of the Duchess of York Sunbathing in France, for example, have been widely published. Some sections of the media justify their intrusion by saying it is in the public interest. In a democracy, they argue, the public has a right to know what people in positions of power are doing. Politicians and others are accountable for their lives. Privacy laws, these critics say, would protect the privileged. Additionally, many politicians use their private lives to gain popular support, for example by parading their families before cameras to emphasized “traditional value”. Hence, some editors say they are justified in prying into private lives to uncover any faults. Likewise, the Royal Family is supported from public funds, and therefore it is argued that its members should lead responsible private lives. . Which of the following can be inferred from the passage
微信支付 
支付宝支付