题目内容

Mr Ding picked up a handbag lost by somebody when he was walking in the park. There was lots of cash, some bills of exchange and a set of commercial documents in the handbag. Mr Ding found, from the information on the documents, the owner of this handbag was Ms Liang and contacted her.
On the day, as fixed by Mr Ding and Ms Liang via exchange of communications, Ms Liang went to Mr Ding’s home to take back the handbag. Before handing over the handbag to Ms Liang, however, Mr Ding requested a sum of cash as a reward for his kindness and efforts to return the lost handbag. Ms Liang refused to give the reward.
Required:
Answer the following questions in accordance with the Property Law, and give your reasons for your answer:
(a) state whether Mr Ding was entitled to request a reward for returning the lost handbag; (3 marks)
(b) if Ms Liang had put up an advertisement offering a reward for the successful find of the lost property, state whether she could refuse to grant the reward if she learnt that Mr Ding did not see the advertisement; (4 marks)
(c) assuming Mr Ding could not find the owner and turned the handbag over to the police who then published an announcement of finding of the lost property in the newspaper, state how to deal with the handbag where nobody claimed it. (3 marks)

查看答案

搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈

更多问题

In relation to the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law of China:
(a) explain under what circumstances and when the community liabilities will take place; (3 marks)
(b) state when the community liabilities can be cleared in the process of bankruptcy liquidation; (2 marks)
(c) state at least TWO items which should be regarded as community liabilities. (5 marks)

Shenhua Company Ltd (Shenhua) has been buying products from Kangyi Chemicals Company (Kangyi Chemicals) for more than one year. By the end of 2013, the two parties negotiated to settle the previous business transactions and confirmed that Shenhua owed an outstanding amount of RMB 800,000 yuan to Kangyi Chemicals.
Several days later, Shenhua entered into an agreement with its holding company, namely Shenhua Holdings, to transfer all its debts of RMB 800,000 yuan due. In doing so, Shenhua neither notified Kangyi Chemicals, nor got a consent from Kangyi Chemicals.
Having discovered this information, Kangyi Chemicals sent an email to Shenhua Holdings to inquire whether Shenhua’s debts had been transferred to Shenhua Holdings. Shenhua Holdings acknowledged the transfer but did not promise to settle the debts as a new debtor.
Kangyi Chemicals filed a lawsuit against Shenhua Holdings for the unsettled RMB 800,000 yuan. Shenhua Holdings submitted the following defences: First, the transfer agreement between Shenhua and Shenhua Holdings was an invalid one as Shenhua failed to get prior consent, as required by the law, from Kangyi Chemicals before the completion of transfer. Second, the goods delivered by Kangyi Chemicals in the last six months contained material defects which caused loss and damage to Shenhua as the original counterparty.
Required:
Answer the following questions in accordance with the Contract Law, and give your reasons for your answers:
(a) state whether the transfer agreement between Shenhua and Shenhua Holdings was a valid one; (6 marks)
(b) state whether Shenhua Holdings was entitled to submit its defence on the ground of the defects in the goods delivered by Kangyi Chemicals to Shenhua. (4 marks)

In relation to the Labour Contract Law of China:
(a) state the various circumstances under which a labour contract is NOT permitted to contain a probation clause; (2 marks)
(b) state THREE conditions under which an employer may dissolve a labour contract during the period of probation; (6 marks)
(c) state what an employer should do if it dissolves a labour contract during the period of probation. (2 marks)

制作外部链接的时候，可以在“链接”文本框中直接用键盘输人该网页在Internet上的，并且包括所使用的。