题目内容
The answer can be as easy as contacting Susan's Healthy Gourmet, an organization devoted to bringing delicious and healthy meals to your home. In fact, Susan's can supply you with three meals a day and the menu is decidedly selective and interesting. No boring institutional-style. meals from this company. And Susan's can accommodate people with special dietary needs.
The meals come in three different portion sizes -- adding up to 1,100, 1,500 or 1,800 calories (卡路里) per day fur three fresh meals. If you're watching your weight and want to be able to count calories, this is a great plan. Having healthy meals delivered is a real godsend, even for active seniors.
The Healthy Gourmet offerings can fit into a kosher (合于犹太戒律的) diet as well. You select the dishes you'd like to eat for breakfast, lunch, and dinner -- and you will get your four days of low-fat food delivered on Monday, and three more on Friday. All you'll have to do is heat the dishes for two to three minutes in your microwave and you'll have a nice meal.
Meals start as low as $4.95, and the service even remembers man's best friend with doggie bones sold by the dozen. Call toll-free at (888) EZ-MEALS, or the local number in La Join (858) 345-1256.
According to the first paragraph we may say that ______.
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
Part A
Directions: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D . Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1.
One of the principal of Walzer's critique of liberal capitalism is that it is insufficiently egalitarian. Walzer's case against the economic inequality generated by capitalism and in favor of "a radical redistribution of wealth" is presented in a widely cited essay entitled "In Defense of Equality."
The most striking feature of Waizer's critique is that, far from rejecting the principle of reward according to merit, Walzer insists, on its validity. People who excel should receive the superior benefits appropriate to their excellence. But people exhibit a great variety of qualities—" intelligence, physical strength, agility and grace, artistic creativity, mechanical skill, leadership, endurance, memory, psychological insight, tile capacity for hard work—even moral strength, sensitivity, the ability to express compassion". Each deserves its proper recompense, and hence a proper distribution of material goods should reflect human differences as measured on all these different scales. Yet, under capitalism, the ability to make money ("the green thumb of bourgeois society") enables its possessor to acquire almost "every other sort of social good" such as the respect and esteem of others.
The centerpiece of Walzer's argument is the invocation of a quotation from Pascal's Pensees, which concludes: "Tyranny is the wish to obtain by one means what can only be had by another." Pascal believes that we owe different duties to different qualities. So we might say that infatuation is the proper response to charm, and awe the proper response to strength. In this light, Walzer characterizes capitalism as the tyranny of money (or of the ability to make it). And Walzer advocates as the means of eliminating this tyranny and of restoring genuine equality "the abolition of the power of money outside its sphere" . What Walzer envisions is a society in which wealth is no longer convertible into social goods with which it has no intrinsic connection. Walzer's argument is a puzzling one.
After all, why should those qualities unrelated to the production of material goods be rewarded with material goods？ Is it not tyrannical, in Pascal's sense, to insist that those who excel in "sensitivity" or "the ability to express compassion" merit aqua] wealth with those who excel in qualities (such as "the capacity for hard work" ) essential in producing wealthy Yet Waizer's argument, how- ever deficient, does point out one of the most serious weaknesses of capitalism-that it brings pre- dominant positions to people who, no matter how legitimately they have earned their material re- wards, often lack those other qualities that evoke affection or admiration. Some even argue plausibly that this weakness may be irremediable: in any society that, like a capitalist society, seeks to be- come ever wealthier in material terms disproportionate rewards are bound to flow to the people who are instrumental in producing the increase in its wealth.
The author write this passage mainly to______.
Americans intentionally choose particular eye signals to show their personal emotions towards their talking partners.
The author's attitude towards Walzer's theory in "In Defense of Equality" can be best de-
A．Communication through language is unlimited.B．Only man uses language.C．There are no
微信支付 
支付宝支付