题目内容

[文字开始]
一般我们看到的电脑都是由主机(主要部分)、输出设备(显示器)、输入设备(键盘和鼠标)三大部件组成。而主机是电脑的主体，在主机箱中有：主板、CPU、内存、电源、显卡、声卡、网卡、硬盘、软驱、光驱等硬件。
从基本结构上来讲，电脑可以分为五大部分：运算器、存储器、控制器、输入设备和输出设备。
[文字结束]

查看答案

搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈

更多问题

SECTION B ENGLISH TO CHINESE
Directions: Translate the following text into Chinese.
The problem is that in the last generation or so we yet come to assume that women should be able, and should want, to do everything that by tradition men have done at the same time as pretty well everything that by tradition women have done. And it's just not possible. Indeed since adopting a male agenda in life is arguably only another form. of submission, quite a number of highly educated and economically privileged women are now opting to take career breaks so as to be at home with their children for longer than that insulting 18 weeks.
The most welcome trend in parenting is that men are participating more and more. Even that is not free of conflict, though. Intellectually, women want men to be equal parents and do their share. But there's often a contradictory emo- tional sub-text because children are the last bastion of distaff power in the family. "I want him to help me but this is my territory and being better at it is one of the few things I've got as a female. "In truth, although they haven't had genera- tions of practice, there's no reason why men can't rear children as well as women. Men left to cope after bereavement or divorce, as well as some who take on the role of principal cater within a partnership, are already doing it.

辨析题
第58小题，8分。要求对命题进行判断并着重阐明理由。请将答案写在答题纸指定位置上。
上海富商高强病重,找其律师留下一份遗嘱。将自己遗产中的20万元存款赠给其深圳的同窗好友周刚,另外将30万元存款交由其妹高丽(居于北京)继承,其余的不动产及动产由其妻子沈琴、儿子高小杰、女儿高小红平分。1997年6月5日高强病故。他指定的律师立即把高强的死讯及高强遗嘱的内容通知了周刚和高丽。高强葬礼期间,周刚与高丽均到上海参加,但未向高强的家人作出任何是否接受高强遗嘱的表示。1997年8月10日,高强的律师召集高强的各继承人开会准备分割遗产,高丽与周刚均未到场。高强的妻子沈琴认为,高丽和周刚已默示放弃继承,遗嘱中指定给他们的财产应转由自己和一双儿女继承。沈琴的说法是否正确？试运用民法原理并结合我国有关法律规定加以分析。

注册会计师王嘉在对X股份有限公司的年终审计中,发现该公司当年与筹资和投资相关的业务如下。
(1)从银行贷款5000万元;
(2)新增加股东投资,占全公司总股份的20%;
(3)向H公司投资一套设备,期限两年,价值40万元;
(4)购买Y公司的债券,面值50万元,发行价52万元。
要求:注册会计师王嘉在审计中如何确定上述业务的合法性？

背景资料
甲公司投资建设一幢地下一层，地上五层的框架结构商场工程，乙施工企业中标后，双方采用《建设工程施工合同》(示范文本)(GF—1999—0201)签订了合同，合同采用固定总价承包方式，合同工期为405天，并约定提前或逾期竣工的奖罚标准为每天5万元。
合同履行中出现了以下事件：
事件一：乙方施工至首层框架柱钢筋绑扎时，甲方书面通知将首层及以上各层由原设计层高4.3米变更为4.8米，当日乙方停工，25天后甲方才提供正式变更图纸，工程恢复施工。复工当日乙方立即提出停窝工损失150万元和顺延工期25天的书面报告及相关索赔资料，但甲方收到后始终未予答复。
事件二：在工程装修阶段，乙方收到了经甲方确认的设计变更文件，调整了部分装修材料的品种和档次，乙方在施工完毕三个月后的预算中申报了该项设计变更增加费80万元，但遭到甲方的拒绝。
事件三：从甲方下达开工令起至竣工验收合格止，本工程历时425天。甲方以乙方逾期竣工为由从应付款中扣减了违约金100万元，乙方认为逾期竣工的责任在于甲方。
问题：
事件一中，乙方的索赔是否生效？结合合同索赔条款说明理由。