题目内容
赵某在四川省某市结识钱某，两人商定用蒙汗药将运输棉纱的司机迷昏后劫取棉纱，并一同购买了蒙汗药。随后两人一直寻找作案机会。某日，两人搭乘个体户孙某驾驶的载有12吨棉纱由当地驶往某市的东风半挂车(车辆价值4.5万元，棉纱价值32万元)到四川省某乡。天黑时，车行至国道314线甘沟路段98公里处，钱某趁孙某停车换轮胎之机，用菜刀逼孙某交出汽车钥匙，并拿钥匙开走了车。在开了一段距离之后，赵某告诉钱某如果孙某还活着，去公安局报案的话，那他们就很狼狈，不如把孙某灭口算了。于是两人往回开车，发现孙某还停留在原地打电话。钱某下车意欲杀害孙某，用石头朝其头部砸了一下，致孙某倒地。之后钱某抬着孙的头部，赵某抬着孙的双脚(腿、脚还在动)，将其扔到路基下。因怕被人发现，两人走下路基，又把孙某往下拖了几米。钱某又用石头朝孙某砸了几下，并用石头将其压住。然后两人一起驾车逃离现场。孙某因头部受打击，造成严重颅脑损伤、脑挫裂伤死亡。 问：赵某、钱某的行为构成何种犯罪说明原因。
查看答案
搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈
更多问题
Which of the following questions is the speaker trying to answer
The closure of the West Bank and Gaza Strip will ______.
尚某为铁路分局领导，享有对计划内火车票进行分配的职权。如果具有尚某签发并加盖其私章的计划内火车票订票单，即可顺利购买到火车票。王某与尚某有亲戚关系，多次通过这一便利条件购买到火车票。在年关时节，火车票购买困难，王某见此情形遂产生牟利意图。其以尚某交给的火车票订票单为模本进行复制，并刻制尚某印章，模仿尚某签名，制作大量的假火车票订单，将此兜售给个人，共获利1万多元。 问：王某的行为是否构成犯罪如果构成犯罪，其触犯的罪名是什么理由是什么
TEXT C The Guildford Four, freed last week after spending 15 years in prison for crimes they did not commit, would almost certainly have been executed for the pub bombing they were convicted of had the death penalty been in force at the time of their trial. There may now be a decent interval before the pro-hanging lobby, which has the support of the Prime Minister, makes another attempt to reintroduce the noose. Reflections along these lines were about the only kind of consolation to be derived from this gross miscarriage of justice which is now to be the subject of a judicial inquiry. In the meantime, defence lawyers are demanding compensation and have in mind about half a million pounds for each of their clients. The first three to be released -- Mr. Gerald Conlon, Mr. Paddy Armstrong and Ms. Carole Richardson -- left prison with the 34 pounds which is given to all departing inmates. The fourth, Mr. Paul Hill, was not released immediately but taken to Belfast, where he lodged an appeal against his conviction for the murder of a former British soldier. Since this conviction, too, was based on the now discredited statements allegedly made to the Survey policy, he was immediately let out on bail. But he left empty-handed. The immediate reaction to the scandal was renewed demand for the reexamination of the case against the Birmingham Six, who are serving life sentences for pub bombings in that city. Thus far the Home secretary, Mr, Douglas Hurd, is insisting that the two cases are not comparable; that what is now known about the Guilford investigation has no relevance to what happened in Birmingham. Mr. Hurd is right to the extent that there was a small-though flimsy and hotly-contested -- amount of forensic evidence in the Birmingham case. The disturbing similarity is that the Birmingham Six, like the Guilford Four, claim that police of- ricers lied and fabricated evidence to secure a conviction. Making scapegoats of a few rogue police officers will not be sufficient to expunge the Guildford miscarriage of justice. These are already demands that the law should be changed first to make it impossible to convict on "confessions" alone; and secondly to require that statements from accused persons should only be taken in the presence of an independent third party to ensure they are not made under coercion. It was also being noted this week that the Guilford Four owe their release more to the persistence of investigative reporters than to the diligence of either the judiciary or the police. Yet investigative reports -- particularly on television -- have recently been a particular target for the condemnation of Mrs. Thatcher and some of her ministers who seem to think that TV should be muzzled in the public interest and left to get on with soap operas and quiz shows. The existing law states that ______.
微信支付 
支付宝支付