3 Ashlee, a public limited company, is preparing its group financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2005. The
company applies newly issued IFRSs at the earliest opportunity. The group comprises three companies, Ashlee, the
holding company, and its 100% owned subsidiaries Pilot and Gibson, both public limited companies. The group
financial statements at first appeared to indicate that the group was solvent and in a good financial position. However,
after the year end, but prior to the approval of the financial statements mistakes have been found which affect the
financial position of the group to the extent that loan covenant agreements have been breached.
As a result the loan creditors require Ashlee to cut its costs, reduce its operations and reorganise its activities.
Therefore, redundancies are planned and the subsidiary, Pilot, is to be reorganised. The carrying value of Pilot’s net
assets, including allocated goodwill, was $85 million at 31 March 2005, before taking account of reorganisation
costs. The directors of Ashlee wish to include $4 million of reorganisation costs in the financial statements of Pilot for
the year ended 31 March 2005. The directors of Ashlee have prepared cash flow projections which indicate that the
net present value of future net cash flows from Pilot is expected to be $84 million if the reorganisation takes place
and $82 million if the reorganisation does not take place.
Ashlee had already decided prior to the year end to sell the other subsidiary, Gibson. Gibson will be sold after the
financial statements have been signed. The contract for the sale of Gibson was being negotiated at the time of the
preparation of the financial statements and it is expected that Gibson will be sold in June 2005.
The carrying amounts of Gibson and Pilot including allocated goodwill were as follows at the year end:
The fair value of the net assets of Gibson at the year end was $415 million and the estimated costs of selling the
company were $5 million.
Part of the business activity of Ashlee is to buy and sell property. The directors of Ashlee had signed a contract on
1 March 2005 to sell two of its development properties which are carried at the lower of cost and net realisable value
under IAS 2 ‘Inventories’. The sale was agreed at a figure of $40 million (carrying value $30 million). A receivable of
$40 million and profit of $10 million were recognised in the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2005.
The sale of the properties was completed on 1 May 2005 when the legal title passed. The policy used in the prior
year was to recognise revenue when the sale of such properties had been completed.
Additionally, Ashlee had purchased, on 1 April 2004, 150,000 shares of a public limited company, Race, at a price
of $20 per share. Ashlee had incurred transaction costs of $100,000 to acquire the shares. The company is unsure
as to whether to classify this investment as ‘available for sale’ or ‘at fair value through profit and loss’ in the financial
statements for the year ended 31 March 2005. The quoted price of the shares at 31 March 2005 was $25 per share.
The shares purchased represent approximately 1% of the issued share capital of Race and are not classified as ‘held
for trading’.
There is no goodwill arising in the group financial statements other than that set out above.
Required:
Discuss the implications, with suitable computations, of the above events for the group financial statements of
Ashlee for the year ended 31 March 2005.
(25 marks)
1 Paxis plc will soon announce a takeover bid for Wragger plc, a company in the same industry. The initial bid will be
an all share bid of four Paxis shares for every five Wragger shares.
The most recent annual data relating to the two companies are shown below:
The takeover is expected to result in cost savings in advertising and distribution, reducing the operating costs
(including depreciation) of Paxis from 76% of sales to 70% of sales. The growth rate of the combined company is
expected to be 6% per year for four years, and 5% per year thereafter. Wragger’s debt obligations will be taken over
by Paxis. The corporate tax rate is expected to remain at 30%.
Sales and costs relevant to the decision may be assumed to be in cash terms.
Required:
(a) Using free cash flow analysis for each individual company and the potential combined company, estimate
how much synergy is expected to be created from the takeover. State clearly any assumptions that you make.
Note: The weighted average cost of capital of the combined company may be assumed to be the market weighted
average of the current costs of capital of the individual companies, weighted by the current market value of debt and
equity of the combined company, with the equity of Wragger adjusted for the effect of the bid price. (20 marks)