具体项目机会研究比一般机会研究更为普遍,它将()转变为(),其目的是()。
查看答案
PART 1
1. The examiner asks the candidate about him/herself, his/her home, work or studies and other familiar topics.
EXAMPLE
★Work
— Do you work or arc you a student?
— What work do you do?
— What are your responsibilities at work?
— Would you like to change your job?
— How do you and your colleagues help each other at work?
— Do you often get together with your colleagues after work?
★Family
— Do you live alone or with other people?
— What jobs do the people in your immediate family do?
— What kind of things do you and your family do together?
— Who does the housework in your home?
★Festivals
— Do you often celebrate festivals in your country?
— Do these festivals have special meanings?
— Are there any festivals special to your city or region?
— What special things do people do during festivals?
— Do you celebrate any foreign festivals?
某物流公司有一笔123600元的资金,准备存入银行,希望在7年后利用这笔款项的本利和购买一套生产设备,当时的银行存款利率为复利10%,该设备的预计价格为240000元。求:用数据说明7年后这个公司能否用这笔款项的本利和购买该设备。
经有关部门批准,某省共有7家旅行社具有台湾游组团资格。自台湾游开展以来,各旅行社竞争激烈,台湾游价格一降再降,致使该旅游线路利润直线下滑。为扭转这种不利局面,在个别旅行社发起下,该省7家台湾游旅行社共同签署“自律公约”,公约规定,从2009年4月7日起,7家旅行社只提供5天4晚以上且每晚1600元的台湾游产品。相关参与企业负责人表示,台湾游市场方兴未史,但是已经出现少数旅行社以超出成本价的极低价竞争手法,损害了台湾游市场的健康发展和游客的出游信心,而公约能够保障游客享受到高品质的台湾游。但该公约却遭到了公众的反对,一位原本打算报名参加台湾游的游客表示:“7家旅行社垄断了全省的台湾游参团资源,还规定只能住四花(星)以上的酒店,但是对于我而言,吃住并不重要,重要的是能看看台湾风光,难道看一看台湾非要住高星级宾馆?”。试分析:
上述7家旅行社共同签署的“自律公约”是否违反我国反垄断法?
对于此类行为的反垄断法分析是适用本身违法原则,还是适用合理原则?
请帮忙给出每个问题的正确答案和分析,谢谢!