问答题

The following trial balance relates to Highwood at 31 March 2011:<br>The following notes are relevant:<br>(i) An equity dividend of 5 cents per share was paid in November 2010 and charged to retained earnings.<br>(ii) The 8% $30 million convertible loan note was issued on 1 April 2010 at par. Interest is payable annually in arrears on 31 March each year. The loan note is redeemable at par on 31 March 2013 or convertible into equity shares at the option of the loan note holders on the basis of 30 equity shares for each $100 of loan note. Highwood’s finance director has calculated that to issue an equivalent loan note without the conversion rights it would have to pay an interest rate of 10% per annum to attract investors.<br>The present value of $1 receivable at the end of each year, based on discount rates of 8% and 10% are:<br>(iii) Non-current assets:<br>On 1 April 2010 Highwood decided for the first time to value its freehold property at its current value. A qualified property valuer reported that the market value of the freehold property on this date was $80 million, of which $30 million related to the land. At this date the remaining estimated life of the property was 20 years. Highwood does not make a transfer to retained earnings in respect of excess depreciation on the revaluation of its assets.<br>Plant is depreciated at 20% per annum on the reducing balance method.<br>All depreciation of non-current assets is charged to cost of sales.<br>(iv) The balance on current tax represents the under/over provision of the tax liability for the year ended 31 March 2010. The required provision for income tax for the year ended 31 March 2011 is $19·4 million. The difference between the carrying amounts of the net assets of Highwood (including the revaluation of the property in note (iii) above) and their (lower) tax base at 31 March 2011 is $27 million. Highwood’s rate of income tax is 25%.<br>(v) The inventory of Highwood was not counted until 4 April 2011 due to operational reasons. At this date its value at cost was $36 million and this figure has been used in the cost of sales calculation above. Between the year end of 31 March 2011 and 4 April 2011, Highwood received a delivery of goods at a cost of $2·7 million and made sales of $7·8 million at a mark-up on cost of 30%. Neither the goods delivered nor the sales made in this period were included in Highwood’s purchases (as part of cost of sales) or revenue in the above trial balance.<br>(vi) On 31 March 2011 Highwood factored (sold) trade receivables with a book value of $10 million to Easyfinance. Highwood received an immediate payment of $8·7 million and will pay Easyfinance 2% per month on any uncollected balances. Any of the factored receivables outstanding after six months will be refunded to Easyfinance. Highwood has derecognised the receivables and charged $1·3 million to administrative expenses. If Highwood had not factored these receivables it would have made an allowance of $600,000 against them.<br>Required:<br>(i) Prepare the statement of comprehensive income for Highwood for the year ended 31 March 2011;<br>(ii) Prepare the statement of changes in equity for Highwood for the year ended 31 March 2011;<br>(iii) Prepare the statement of financial position of Highwood as at 31 March 2011.<br>Note: your answers and workings should be presented to the nearest $1,000; notes to the financial statements are not required.<br>The following mark allocation is provided as guidance for this question:<br>(i) 11 marks<br>(ii) 4 marks<br>(iii) 10 marks


问答题

Greenfields Co specialises in manufacturing equipment which can help to reduce toxic emissions in the production of chemicals. The company has grown rapidly over the past eight years and this is due partly to the warranties that the company gives to its customers. It guarantees its products for five years and if problems arise in this period it undertakes to fix them, or provide a replacement product.<br>You are the manager responsible for the audit of Greenfields and you are performing the final review stage of the audit and have come across the following two issues.<br>Receivable balance owing from Yellowmix Co<br>Greenfields has a material receivable balance owing from its customer, Yellowmix Co. During the year-end audit, your team reviewed the ageing of this balance and found that no payments had been received from Yellowmix for over six months, and Greenfields would not allow this balance to be circularised. Instead management has assured your team that they will provide a written representation confirming that the balance is recoverable.<br>Warranty provision<br>The warranty provision included within the statement of financial position is material. The audit team has performed testing over the calculations and assumptions which are consistent with prior years. The team has requested a written representation from management confirming the basis and amount of the provision are reasonable. Management has yet to confirm acceptance of this representation.<br>Required:<br>(a) Describe the audit procedures required in respect of accounting estimates. (5 marks)<br>(b) For each of the two issues above:<br>(i) Discuss the appropriateness of written representations as a form. of audit evidence; and (4 marks)<br>(ii) Describe additional procedures the auditor should now perform. in order to reach a conclusion on the balance to be included in the financial statements. (6 marks)<br>Note: The total marks will be split equally between each issue.<br>(c) The directors of Greenfields have decided not to provide the audit firm with the written representation for the warranty provision as they feel that it is unnecessary.<br>Required:<br>Explain the steps the auditor of Greenfields Co should now take and the impact on the audit report in relation to the refusal to provide the written representation. (5 marks)


问答题

(a) Explain the purpose of a value for money audit. (4 marks)<br>(b) Bluesberry hospital is located in a country where healthcare is free, as the taxpayers fund the hospitals which are owned by the government. Two years ago management reviewed all aspects of hospital operations and instigated a number of measures aimed at improving overall ‘value for money’ for the local community. Management have asked that you, an audit manager in the hospital’s internal audit department, perform. a review over the measures which have been implemented.<br>Bluesberry has one centralised buying department and all purchase requisition forms for medical supplies must be forwarded here. Upon receipt the buying team will research the lowest price from suppliers and a purchase order is raised. This is then passed to the purchasing director, who authorises all orders. The small buying team receive in excess of 200 forms a day.<br>The human resources department has had difficulties with recruiting suitably trained staff. Overtime rates have been increased to incentivise permanent staff to fill staffing gaps, this has been popular, and reliance on expensive temporary staff has been reduced. Monitoring of staff hours had been difficult but the hospital has implemented time card clocking in and out procedures and these hours are used for overtime payments as well.<br>The hospital has invested heavily in new surgical equipment, which although very expensive, has meant that more operations could be performed and patient recovery rates are faster. However, currently there is a shortage of appropriately trained medical staff. A capital expenditure committee has been established, made up of senior managers, and they plan and authorise any significant capital expenditure items.<br>Required:<br>(i) Identify and explain FOUR STRENGTHS within Bluesberry’s operating environment; and (6 marks)<br>(ii) For each strength identified, describe how Bluesberry might make further improvements to provide the best value for money. (4 marks)<br>(c) Describe TWO substantive procedures the external auditor of Bluesberry should adopt to verify EACH of the following assertions in relation to an entity’s property, plant and equipment;<br>(i) Valuation;<br>(ii) Completeness; and<br>(iii) Rights and obligations.<br>Note: Assume that the hospital adopts International Financial Reporting Standards. (6 marks)


问答题

(a) Auditors have a responsibility under ISA 265 Communicating Deficiencies in Internal Control to those Charged with Governance and Management, to communicate deficiencies in internal controls. In particular SIGNIFICANT deficiencies in internal controls must be communicated in writing to those charged with governance.<br>Required:<br>Explain examples of matters the auditor should consider in determining whether a deficiency in internal controls is significant. (5 marks)<br>Greystone Co is a retailer of ladies clothing and accessories. It operates in many countries around the world and has expanded steadily from its base in Europe. Its main market is aimed at 15 to 35 year olds and its prices are mid to low range. The company’s year end was 30 September 2010.<br>In the past the company has bulk ordered its clothing and accessories twice a year. However, if their goods failed to meet the key fashion trends then this resulted in significant inventory write downs. As a result of this the company has recently introduced a just in time ordering system. The fashion buyers make an assessment nine months in advance as to what the key trends are likely to be, these goods are sourced from their suppliers but only limited numbers are initially ordered.<br>Greystone Co has an internal audit department but at present their only role is to perform. regular inventory counts at the stores.<br>Ordering process<br>Each country has a purchasing manager who decides on the initial inventory levels for each store, this is not done in conjunction with store or sales managers. These quantities are communicated to the central buying department at the head office in Europe. An ordering clerk amalgamates all country orders by specified regions of countries, such as Central Europe and North America, and passes them to the purchasing director to review and authorise.<br>As the goods are sold, it is the store manager’s responsibility to re-order the goods through the purchasing manager; they are prompted weekly to review inventory levels as although the goods are just in time, it can still take up to four weeks for goods to be received in store.<br>It is not possible to order goods from other branches of stores as all ordering must be undertaken through the purchasing manager. If a customer requests an item of clothing, which is unavailable in a particular store, then the customer is provided with other branch telephone numbers or recommended to try the company website.<br>Goods received and Invoicing<br>To speed up the ordering to receipt of goods cycle, the goods are delivered directly from the suppliers to the individual stores. On receipt of goods the quantities received are checked by a sales assistant against the supplier’s delivery note, and then the assistant produces a goods received note (GRN). This is done at quiet times of the day so as to maximise sales. The checked GRNs are sent to head office for matching with purchase invoices.<br>As purchase invoices are received they are manually matched to GRNs from the stores, this can be a very time consuming process as some suppliers may have delivered to over 500 stores. Once the invoice has been agreed then it is sent to the purchasing director for authorisation. It is at this stage that the invoice is entered onto the purchase ledger.<br>Required:<br>(b) As the external auditors of Greystone Co, write a report to management in respect of the purchasing system which:<br>(i) Identifies and explains FOUR deficiencies in that system;<br>(ii) Explains the possible implication of each deficiency;<br>(iii) Provides a recommendation to address each deficiency.<br>A covering letter is required.<br>Note: Up to two marks will be awarded within this requirement for presentation. (14 marks)<br>(c) Describe substantive procedures the auditor should perform. on the year-end trade payables of Greystone Co. (5 marks)<br>(d) Describe additional assignments that the internal audit department of Greystone Co could be asked to perform. by those charged with governance. (6 marks)


问答题

(a) IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors contains guidance on the use of accounting policies and accounting estimates.<br>Required:<br>Explain the basis on which the management of an entity must select its accounting policies and distinguish, with an example, between changes in accounting policies and changes in accounting estimates. (5 marks)<br>(b) The directors of Tunshill are disappointed by the draft profi t for the year ended 30 September 2010. The company’s assistant accountant has suggested two areas where she believes the reported profi t may be improved:<br>(i) A major item of plant that cost $20 million to purchase and install on 1 October 2007 is being depreciated on a straight-line basis over a fi ve-year period (assuming no residual value). The plant is wearing well and at the beginning of the current year (1 October 2009) the production manager believed that the plant was likely to last eight years in total (i.e. from the date of its purchase). The assistant accountant has calculated that, based on an eight-year life (and no residual value) the accumulated depreciation of the plant at 30 September 2010 would be $7·5 million ($20 million/8 years x 3). In the fi nancial statements for the year ended 30 September 2009, the accumulated depreciation was $8 million ($20 million/5 years x 2). Therefore, by adopting an eight-year life, Tunshill can avoid a depreciation charge in the current year and instead credit $0·5 million ($8 million – $7·5 million) to the income statement in the current year to improve the reported profi t. (5 marks)<br>(ii) Most of Tunshill’s competitors value their inventory using the average cost (AVCO) basis, whereas Tunshill uses the fi rst in fi rst out (FIFO) basis. The value of Tunshill’s inventory at 30 September 2010 (on the FIFO basis) is $20 million, however on the AVCO basis it would be valued at $18 million. By adopting the same method (AVCO) as its competitors, the assistant accountant says the company would improve its profi t for the year ended 30 September 2010 by $2 million. Tunshill’s inventory at 30 September 2009 was reported as $15 million, however on the AVCO basis it would have been reported as $13·4 million. (5 marks)<br>Required:<br>Comment on the acceptability of the assistant accountant’s suggestions and quantify how they would affect the fi nancial statements if they were implemented under IFRS. Ignore taxation.<br>Note: the mark allocation is shown against each of the two items above.


问答题

Hardy is a public listed manufacturing company. Its summarised fi nancial statements for the year ended 30 September 2010 (and 2009 comparatives) are:<br>Income statements for the year ended 30 September:<br>Statements of fi nancial position as at 30 September:<br>The following information has been obtained from the Chairman’s Statement and the notes to the fi nancial statements:<br>‘Market conditions during the year ended 30 September 2010 proved very challenging due largely to diffi culties in the global economy as a result of a sharp recession which has led to steep falls in share prices and property values. Hardy has not been immune from these effects and our properties have suffered impairment losses of $6 million in the year.’<br>The excess of these losses over previous surpluses has led to a charge to cost of sales of $1·5 million in addition to the normal depreciation charge.<br>‘Our portfolio of investments at fair value through profi t or loss has been ‘marked to market’ (fair valued) resulting in a loss of $1·6 million (included in administrative expenses).’<br>There were no additions to or disposals of non-current assets during the year<br>‘In response to the downturn the company has unfortunately had to make a number of employees redundant incurring severance costs of $1·3million (included in cost of sales) and undertaken cost savings in advertising and other administrative expenses.’<br>‘The diffi culty in the credit markets has meant that the fi nance cost of our variable rate bank loan has increased from 4·5% to 8%. In order to help cash fl ows, the company made a rights issue during the year and reduced the dividend per share by 50%.’<br>‘Despite the above events and associated costs, the Board believes the company’s underlying performance has been quite resilient in these diffi cult times.’<br>Required:<br>Analyse and discuss the fi nancial performance and position of Hardy as portrayed by the above fi nancial statements and the additional information provided.<br>Your analysis should be supported by profi tability, liquidity and gearing and other appropriate ratios (up to 10 marks available).


问答题

The following trial balance relates to Cavern as at 30 September 2010:<br>The following notes are relevant:<br>(i) Cavern has accounted for a fully subscribed rights issue of equity shares made on 1 April 2010 of one new share for every four in issue at 42 cents each. The company paid ordinary dividends of 3 cents per share on 30 November 2009 and 5 cents per share on 31 May 2010. The dividend payments are included in administrative expenses in the trial balance.<br>(ii) The 8% loan note was issued on 1 October 2008 at its nominal (face) value of $30 million. The loan note will be redeemed on 30 September 2012 at a premium which gives the loan note an effective fi nance cost of 10% per annum.<br>(iii) Non-current assets:<br>Cavern revalues its land and building at the end of each accounting year. At 30 September 2010 the relevant value to be incorporated into the fi nancial statements is $41·8 million. The building’s remaining life at the beginning of the current year (1 October 2009) was 18 years. Cavern does not make an annual transfer from the revaluation reserve to retained earnings in respect of the realisation of the revaluation surplus. Ignore deferred tax on the revaluation surplus.<br>Plant and equipment includes an item of plant bought for $10 million on 1 October 2009 that will have a 10-year life (using straight-line depreciation with no residual value). Production using this plant involves toxic chemicals which will cause decontamination costs to be incurred at the end of its life. The present value of these costs using a discount rate of 10% at 1 October 2009 was $4 million. Cavern has not provided any amount for this future decontamination cost. All other plant and equipment is depreciated at 12·5% per annum using the reducing balance method.<br>No depreciation has yet been charged on any non-current asset for the year ended 30 September 2010. All depreciation is charged to cost of sales.<br>(iv) The available-for-sale investments held at 30 September 2010 had a fair value of $13·5 million. There were no acquisitions or disposals of these investments during the year ended 30 September 2010.<br>(v) A provision for income tax for the year ended 30 September 2010 of $5·6 million is required. The balance on current tax represents the under/over provision of the tax liability for the year ended 30 September 2009. At 30 September 2010 the tax base of Cavern’s net assets was $15 million less than their carrying amounts. The movement on deferred tax should be taken to the income statement. The income tax rate of Cavern is 25%.<br>Required:<br>(a) Prepare the statement of comprehensive income for Cavern for the year ended 30 September 2010.<br>(b) Prepare the statement of changes in equity for Cavern for the year ended 30 September 2010.<br>(c) Prepare the statement of fi nancial position of Cavern as at 30 September 2010.<br>Notes to the fi nancial statements are not required.<br>The following mark allocation is provided as guidance for this question:<br>(a) 11 marks<br>(b) 5 marks<br>(c) 9 marks


问答题

On 1 June 2010, Premier acquired 80% of the equity share capital of Sanford. The consideration consisted of two elements: a share exchange of three shares in Premier for every fi ve acquired shares in Sanford and the issue of a $100 6% loan note for every 500 shares acquired in Sanford. The share issue has not yet been recorded by Premier, but the issue of the loan notes has been recorded. At the date of acquisition shares in Premier had a market value of $5 each and the shares of Sanford had a stock market price of $3·50 each. Below are the summarised draft fi nancial statements of both companies.<br>Statements of comprehensive income for the year ended 30 September 2010<br>The following information is relevant:<br>(i) At the date of acquisition, the fair values of Sanford’s assets were equal to their carrying amounts with the exception of its property. This had a fair value of $1·2 million below its carrying amount. This would lead to a reduction of the depreciation charge (in cost of sales) of $50,000 in the post-acquisition period. Sanford has not incorporated this value change into its entity fi nancial statements.<br>Premier’s group policy is to revalue all properties to current value at each year end. On 30 September 2010, the value of Sanford’s property was unchanged from its value at acquisition, but the land element of Premier’s property had increased in value by $500,000 as shown in other comprehensive income.<br>(ii) Sales from Sanford to Premier throughout the year ended 30 September 2010 had consistently been $1 million per month. Sanford made a mark-up on cost of 25% on these sales. Premier had $2 million (at cost to Premier) of inventory that had been supplied in the post-acquisition period by Sanford as at 30 September 2010.<br>(iii) Premier had a trade payable balance owing to Sanford of $350,000 as at 30 September 2010. This agreed with the corresponding receivable in Sanford’s books.<br>(iv) Premier’s investments include some available-for-sale investments that have increased in value by $300,000 during the year. The other equity reserve relates to these investments and is based on their value as at 30 September 2009. There were no acquisitions or disposals of any of these investments during the year ended 30 September 2010.<br>(v) Premier’s policy is to value the non-controlling interest at fair value at the date of acquisition. For this purpose Sanford’s share price at that date can be deemed to be representative of the fair value of the shares held by the non-controlling interest.<br>(vi) There has been no impairment of consolidated goodwill.<br>Required:<br>(a) Prepare the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for Premier for the year ended 30 September 2010.<br>(b) Prepare the consolidated statement of fi nancial position for Premier as at 30 September 2010.<br>The following mark allocation is provided as guidance for this question:<br>(a) 9 marks<br>(b) 16 marks


火星搜题