题目内容

Whether "bigness" makes business sense is the subject of intense debate. Europe has largely stayed out of the skyscraper race. A proposed 66-storey London Bridge Tower, which would be the continent's largest building, may eventually go up. It would not stand out in Manhattan.
Executives in the City of London, Europe's largest financial market, contend that even in a non-earthquake-prone area, once a building rises much above 50 storeys the demand for additional elevators, stairwells and structural supports makes them unacceptably inefficient.
True, up to a point, says Paul Katz, the architect at KPF, but the most efficient building is not necessarily the most valuable. There are some explicit benefits from skyscrapers, notably efficient energy usage, plus less tangible ones such as the savings and benefits that come from clustering employees in one place. Typically, where firms most like to operate, sites are scarce. As a result, it often makes sense to add floors, even at ever greater cost.
Skyscrapers have risen slowly in Japan due to earthquake fears, but now they are going up. With New York's economy suffering, redundancies mounting and continuing fear of terrorism, it is hard to imagine anybody financing new construction in the city, let alone a vast new skyscraper on a site that many believe should be used only as a memorial. But even before the events of September 11th, construction techniques were changing to resolve shortcomings that existed in the 1960s when work began on the World Trade Center. Rather than being supported merely by steel curtain walls, the new skyscrapers have concrete cores linked to strong columns in the outer walls.
Nobody now underestimates the devastation that would be caused if an aircraft strikes a building; but at the least, the new crop of tall buildings are designed so that they would not collapse if hit by even the largest passenger plane. That may not sound particularly reassuring to anyone asked to work on the 100th floor. But the business of building to the sky dates back at least to the tower of Babel—and no disaster has stopped it for long.
The best title for this passage may be

A Construction Company under Fire.
B. Fears Haunted in the World.
C. A Debate on Building Upwards.
D. Skyscrapers on the Boom.

查看答案
更多问题

A.in orderB.in placeC.in spiteD.instead

A. in order
B. in place
C. in spite
D. instead

根据下图提供的信息回答以下问题
2003-2007年河北省城镇居民人均可支配收入增长最多的一年是()。

A. 2004年
B. 2005年
C. 2006年
D. 2007年

阅读以下文字,完成以下问题。
卫星遥感监测在我国起步是比较早的,早在70年代初,我国还没有自己的气象卫星时,国家卫星气象中心就利用接收别国的气象卫星资料,开始了我国的卫星遥感监测工作。随着我国气象事业的发展,卫星遥感监测工作也有了很大的发展。我们有了自己的气象卫星,巨型计算机代替了计算能力只有每秒100万次的微机,而以传真图片传输信息的方式也被网络代替。
目前,我国的卫星遥感监测服务已经业务化,、并且在台风、森林草原火灾、洪涝灾害、沙尘暴监测以及其他各项国民经济建设中起到了重要作用。利用气象卫星遥感监测获得的信息已成为各级领导指挥决策的重要依据。
在没有卫星遥感监测之前.,对森林草原火灾的监测,主要是靠瞭望台进行人工监视和利用远红外探测仪监测,只能监测方圆几十公里的范围,但由于我国国土面积广大,森林的分布又比较分散,监测起来非常困难,而利用卫星则可以大大加强火情监测能力。气象卫星遥感监测为扑灭1987年大兴安岭火灾提供服务,当时利用卫星遥感监测所获得的信息成为扑火指挥部的主要依据。
台风和沙尘暴是危害较大的两种灾害性天气,在对这些严重威胁人民生命财产安全和影响国民经济发展的灾害的监测中,卫星遥感监测更是发挥了重要作用。近年来,随着发生频率的增高,沙尘暴已经成为人们关注的焦点之一。但沙尘暴多形成于较荒凉地区,观测站点少,监测起来比较困难,而用卫星遥感监测则可以弥补这方面的不足。用卫星进行遥感监测,不但可以监测沙尘暴的源地、路径,还可以估计出受沙尘天气影响的程度,为防灾减灾和灾害的治理提供依据。
更为可喜的是,由我国自行研制发射的风云系列气象卫星,已经成为我国进行遥感监测的主要资料来源,并且在工作中积累了大量成功的经验,培养了许多高素质的专业技术人才,为卫星遥感监测服务在将来发挥更大的作用奠定了基础。
下列不属于卫星遥感监测在各项国民经济建设中所起到的重要作用的一项是()。

A. 用卫星进行遥感监测,不但可以监测沙尘暴的源地、路径,还可以估计出受沙尘天气影响的程度,为防灾减灾和灾害的治理提供依据
B. 利用卫星则可以大大加强火情监测能力。气象卫星遥感监测为扑灭1987年大兴安岭火灾提供服务,当时利用卫星遥感监测所获得的信息成为扑火指挥部的主要依据
C. 在对台风和洪涝灾害这些严重威胁人民生命财产安全和影响国民经济发展的灾害的监测中,卫星遥感监测更是发挥了重要作用
D. 虽然我们的起步比较晚,但目前我们有了自己的气象卫星,巨型计算机代替了计算能力只有每秒100万次的微机,而以传真-图片传输信息的方式也被网络代替

每一种商品都能明确地、准确地归入一个H.S编码的品目号下。()

A. 正确
B. 错误

答案查题题库