题目内容

论企业内部网的安全策略
企业网络的建设是企业信息化的基础。近几年，许多企业都陆续建立了自己的企业网，并通过各种方法与Internet相连。网络信息安全已经成为企业信息化成功实施的关键因素。
请围绕“企业内部网的安全策略”论题，依次对以下三个方面进行论述。
1. 概要叙述你参与分析和开发的系统以及你所担任的主要工作。
2．具体叙述在设计该系统时需要考虑的安全因素和选择安全标准的策略，以及在建立系统时所采取的综合安全措施。
3．评价你所采取的安全措施及其效果，以及其中可以改进的方面。

查看答案

搜索结果不匹配？点我反馈

更多问题

简答题
本大题共3小题，每小题8分。
简述影响态度与品德学习的内部条件。

导致民族国家时代的消失。实际上，只要民族国家的界限和利益依旧存在，那么民族国家的观念和意识以及立足于其上的伦理价值趋向——爱国主义，就必须给予足够重视。韩国总统金大中的话给我们以启示。德国记者问他：“你怎样向你的民族意识较强的同胞解释国际货币基金组织要求韩国加强向外国投资者开放的力度？”金大中回答：“我将告诉人民：资本没有国籍。如果我们的商人能自由地去世界各地，那么我们也必须让世界各地的人到韩国来”。这是旗帜鲜明地肯定经济全球化的立场。在回答记者关于如何克服危机的问题时，他又说：“欧洲(债权)人可以放心，我们将依靠果断和爱国主义战胜危机。”这个谈话表明，经济全球化尽管有超越国家界限的一面，但在我们的具体经济工作中，仍然可以做到与爱国主义并行不悖。
——摘自王锐生，《经济全球化与爱国主义并行不悖》
请回答：
(1)为什么说在我们的具体经济工作中，经济全球化“仍然可以做到与爱国主义并行不悖”？
(2)当代大学生应如何正确处理经济全球化与爱国主义的关系？

要“言必信，行必果”、“人而无信，不知其可也”。孟子说：“诚者，天之道也;思诚者，人之道也。”在现实生活中，诚信是我们每一个人做人的底线，也是我们每一个人在与他人进行交往，处理个人与社会、个人与个人之间相互关系时应该遵循的行为准则。2001年10月，中共中央发布了《公民道德实施纲要》，提出“爱国守法，明礼诚信，团结友善，勤俭自强，敬业奉献”的基本道德规范。
但是，随着改革开放的逐步深入和社会主义市场经济的进一步发展，各行各业不同程度地出现了诚信缺失现象，人们发现诚信在消退，“拜金”在滋长。“在社会主义市场经济条件下，讲诚信只会吃亏”的观点日益被越来越多的人奉为信条。“利益”取代了美德，诚信让位于欺诈，这种现象已波及了中学校园。近些年来，有关学生考试作弊，抄袭作业，欺骗老师、家长、同学之事随处可见，甚至开家长会雇个人冒充家长开会。
请回答：
(1)“在社会主义市场经济条件下，讲诚信只会吃亏”的观点是否正确？为什么？
(2)结合材料说明公民道德建设为什么要以诚实守信为重点？
(3)结合材料简述大学生自觉加强诚信道德建设的必要性。

SECTION 2 Optional Translation (30 points)
The theory of evolution by natural selection was put forward in the 1850s independently by two men. One was Charles Darwin; the other was Alfred Russel Wallace. Both men had some scientific background, of course, but at heart both men were naturalists. Darwin had been a medical student at Edinburgh University for two years, before his father who was a wealthy doctor proposed that he might become a clergyman and sent him to Cambridge. Wallace, whose parents were poor and who had left school at 14, had followed courses at Working Men's Institutes in London and Leicester as a surveyor's apprentice and pupil teacher.
The fact is that there are two traditions of explanation that march side by side in the ascent of man. One is the analysis of the physical structure of the world. The other is the study of the processes of life: their delicacy, their diversity, the wavering cycles from life to death in the individual and in the species. And these traditions do not come together until the theory of evolution; because until then there is a paradox which cannot be resolved, which cannot be begun, about life.
The paradox of the life sciences, which makes them different in kind from physical science, is in the detail of nature everywhere. We see it about us in the birds, the trees, the grass, the snails, in every living thing. It is this, the manifestations of life, its expressions, its forms, are so diverse that they must contain a large element of the accidental. And yet the nature of life is so uniform. that it must be constrained by many necessities.
So it is not surprising that biology as we understand it begins with naturalists in the 18th and 19th centuries: observers of the countryside, bird-watchers, clergymen, doctors, gentlemen of leisure in country houses. I am tempted to call them, simply, "gentlemen in Victorian England ", because it cannot be an accident that the theory of evolution is conceived twice by two men living at the same time in the same culture—the culture of Queen Victoria in England.